Skip to content
Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc

The Foundation uses their funds to make grants to non-profit organizations that serve youth, needy citizens, seniors, and some international organizations, such as Kiwanis International, and provide scholarships for college for deserving and needy individuals.

$865k
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$868kHealth$361kHuman Services$293kRecreation & Sports$216kPhilanthropy$117kYouth Development$102kHousing & Shelter$97kInternational$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 55 grants below total $576,937, the rows itemized in this filing. The $865,223 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $288,286 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $302k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $158k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $117k
$6,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Washtenaw Community College Foundation$117,020
Ann Arbor Public Schools$38,419
Kiwanis of Michigan Foundation$33,067
Regents of the University of Michigan$31,485
American Red Cross$13,648
Haiti Nursing Foundation$10,925
Ann Arbor YMCA$10,735
Food Gatherers$10,000
Hope Medical Clinic$10,000
Salvation Army$9,141
Chelsea Education Foundation$8,853
SOS Community Services$8,000
Fisher House Michigan$8,000
Ozone House$8,000
Jewish Family Services of Washtenaw County$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $14k → 14%CHILDREN'S LITERACY NETWORK: $6k → 14%APPLE PLAYSCHOOLS: $6k → 14%HANDS ACROSS THE WATER: $6k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MI: $6k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MI: $6k → 14%NORTHFIELD HUMAN SERVICES: $8k → 14%OZONE HOUSE INC: $28k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $6k → 14%MICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSET: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 19 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
59

Total granted

$1.3M
$595k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

63%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $539k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2022–2024 · $139k · revenue +92%
  • CH
    CORNER HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $51k · revenue +30%
  • HM
    HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $34k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • CM
    CAMPERSHIPS- MEMBER FUNDED
    one grant, 2017 · $49k
  • H
    HIGHSCOPE
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • SC
    SAFEHOUSE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Network

Community action network partners with children, youth and families from under-resourced washtenaw county michigan neighborhoods to create better futures for themselves, and improve the communities in which they live.

Human Services
2
Association for Children's Mental Health

To ensure all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges and their families live in a safe, welcoming community with access to needed services and supports.

Health
3
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
4
Montessori Childrens House of Lenawee Inc

Education of young people in the Montessori method

Human Services
5
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
6
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
7
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
8
Center for Success Network

Center for success unites literacy and community to empower students in the journey of education.

Community Improvement
9
Ann Arbor Community Center Inc

With an emphasis on socio-economically disadvantaged youth and families, the Ann Arbor Community Center, Inc. (AACC) is a vital community resource that provides high quality programs, information and services to citizens in need.

—
10
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
11
Wayne County Court Appointed Special Advocates

To ensure that children who have experienced abuse and/or neglect are in safe and permanent homes by recruiting, screening and training volunteers to advocate on their behalf within the third judicial circuit court's family juvenile…

Human Services
12
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hands Across the Water Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kiwanis of Michigan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
21/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Washtenaw Community College: $469,573 · OtherWashtenaw Community CollegeUniversity of Michigan: $138,525 · OtherUniversity of MichiganANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $135,703 · OtherANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLSWASHTENAW CAMP PLACEMENT: $127,982 · OtherWASHTENAW CAMP PLACEMENTWashtenaw Community College Foundation: $117,020 · OtherWashtenaw Community College FoundationKIWANIS OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $72,838 · Other+103 more: $1,088,573 · Other+103 moreOZONE HOUSE INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $13,648 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $11,800 · Human ServicesNORTHFIELDS HUMAN SERVICES INC WHITMORE LAKE AREA HUMAN SERVICES: $7,500 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK: $6,275 · Human ServicesAPPLE PLAYSCHOOLS: $6,275 · Human ServicesPeace Neighborhood Center: $6,275 · Human ServicesSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6,275 · Human ServicesHANDS ACROSS THE WATER INC: $6,275 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSET: $6,000 · Human ServicesHAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC: $44,510 · InternationalMAKER WORKS COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS: $7,500 · EducationJOYCE IVY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationWASHTENAW PROMISE INC: $7,000 · EducationFAMILY LEARNING INSTITUTE: $6,000 · EducationMARTIN LUTHER KING JR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $5,950 · EducationGIRLS GROUP: $12,275 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE INC: $6,275 · Youth DevelopmentNeutral Zone: $6,275 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY: $20,525 · Recreation & SportsEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureRiverside Arts Center Foundation Inc: $6,275 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,150,214Human Services$98,323International$44,510Education$33,950Youth Development$24,825Recreation & Sports$20,525Arts & Culture$18,775

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $138,525 over 3y, 17% of budgetKIWANIS OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $72,838 over 5y, 10% of budgetCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $51,425 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC: $44,510 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $33,740 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $32,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN: $31,275 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC: $28,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY: $20,525 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWASHTENAW ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY: $18,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSpecial Days Camps: $15,775 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $13,648 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Brighter Way: $13,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $12,275 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $11,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChelsea Education Foundation: $10,603 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetMAKER WORKS COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOYCE IVY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHFIELDS HUMAN SERVICES INC WHITMORE LAKE AREA HUMAN SERVICES: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGARRETT'S SPACE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $7,335 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWASHTENAW PROMISE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget826 MICHIGAN INC: $6,275 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $6,275 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTherapeutic Riding Inc: $6,275 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK: $6,275 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAPPLE PLAYSCHOOLS: $6,275 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER: $6,275 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeace Neighborhood Center: $6,275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRiverside Arts Center Foundation Inc: $6,275 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6,275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC: $6,275 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNeutral Zone: $6,275 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFriends In Deed: $6,275 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHANDS ACROSS THE WATER INC: $6,275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnn Arbor Symphony Orchestra Inc: $6,275 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY LEARNING INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAnn Arbor Young Men's Christian Association: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN FAITH IN ACTION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMICHIGAN FOSTER CARE CLOSET: $6,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $5,950 over 1y, 4.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORNER HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAITI NURSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
  • Who funds WASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WASHTENAW ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Special Days Camps ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds A Brighter Way ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Chelsea Education Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Commun…United Way of Washten…Harry a and Margaret …James a and Faith Kni…Community Foundation …Thrift Shop Associati…Edward F Redies Found…Speckhard-Knight Char…The Martin Family Fou…DTE Energy FoundationUnited Way for Southe…Duffy Foundation
Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI68.2× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor · Edward F Redies Foundation Inc · Speckhard-Knight Charitable Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Duffy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 131 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home