Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kip Kephart Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$127kArts & Culture$97kReligion$8kCrime & Legal$7kAnimals$7kHealth$5kYouth Development$1kFood & Nutrition$750Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$865k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$7,500
VCU$5,200
RICHMOND BALLET$2,000
SURRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,300
VALENTINE RICHMOND HISTORY CENTER$1,250
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND$1,250
HERITAGE LIBRARY$1,018
Individual grant recipient$570
CHARLES CITY SCHOOLS$300
VARIOUS$257
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $89) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE HOUSE & SUPPORT CARE OF WILLIAMSBURG: $64 → 7%SAFE HARBOR: $25 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
CA
UT
MO
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 22 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
32

Total granted

$258k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+39%

Still filing today

27%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VH
    VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +103%
  • TV
    THE VALENTINE MUSEUM
    5× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +176%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • CH
    Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +19%
  • WP
    WEST POINT SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CC
    CHARLES CITY ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
2
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
3
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
4
Richmond County Hospice Inc

Mission is to comfort the body and heal the heart through compassionate quality care during end-of-life experiences, so patients and families may live each day with peace, comfort and dignity. we also serve the community by providing…

Human Services
5
The Humane Society of Baltimore County Inc

Provide a temporary home, safe refuge and care for homeless animals. work aggressively to place each animal in a loving, permanent home. strive to end the euthanasia of healthy, adoptable animals by offering affordable spay, neuter and…

Animals
6
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
7
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
8
Virginia Mason Health System

Advance and support the healthcare and research missions of virginia mason medical center and benaroya research institute at virginia mason through governance oversight of both organizations.

Health
9
Albemarle Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

To advance the humane treatment of dogs and cats by providing comprehensive sheltering, medical care, and behavioral support. we strive to ensure every animal has the opportunity to find a permanent, loving home through community education…

Animals
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
Kitsap Humane Society

Providing positive life changing solutions to people and animals in need.

Animals
12
Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association

Collaborating with our members and stakeholders, vhha works to ensure the sustainability of virginia's health care system and improve the health of all virginians.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richmond Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; the most unlike its peers is Morattico Waterfront Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SURRY COUNTY SCHOOLS: $36,313 · OtherSURRY COUNTY SCHOOLSVCU: $26,800 · OtherVCUVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $23,117 · OtherVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITYHERITAGE LIBRARY: $15,816 · OtherHERITAGE LIBRARYVARIOUS: $14,563 · OtherVARIOUSSURRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $7,300 · Other+33 more: $41,394 · Other+33 moreVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $39,539 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETYTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM: $21,950 · Arts & CultureTHE VALENTINE MUSEUMTHE RICHMOND BALLET: $18,505 · Arts & CultureTHE RICHMOND BALLET+1 more: $1,400 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $21,250 · EducationChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $3,348 · HealthNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $627 · HealthTHE MCSHIN FOUNDATION: $300 · Health+2 more: $128 · HealthSIDE BY SIDE VA INC: $1,014 · Youth DevelopmentHOMES FUR HOUNDS INC: $500 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $350 · AnimalsRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 · AnimalsHOSPICE HOUSE INC: $64 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR: $25 · Human Services
Other$165,303Arts & Culture$81,394Education$21,250Health$4,403Youth Development$1,014Animals$950Human Services$89

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $39,539 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VALENTINE MUSEUM: $21,950 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $21,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RICHMOND BALLET: $18,505 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $3,348 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMorattico Waterfront Museum: $1,400 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetSIDE BY SIDE VA INC: $1,014 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOMES FUR HOUNDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MCSHIN FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE HOUSE INC: $64 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds THE RICHMOND BALLET ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Morattico Waterfront Museum ↗
  • Who funds SIDE BY SIDE VA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FUR HOUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE MCSHIN FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carmax FoundationVA16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carmax Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kip Kephart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kip Kephart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kip Kephart Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kip Kephart Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kip Kephart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph