Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kintzinger Family Foundation Inc %Stuart J Kintzinger

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$74kPhilanthropy$6kCommunity Improvement$5kCivil Rights$4kArts & Culture$3kReligion$3kYouth Development$2kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$960k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETHEL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,601
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TEMPE DIABLOS: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%GOOD NEWS RESCUE: $1k → 14%OTHER ORGANIZATIONS: $10k → 5%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $500 → 13%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA LAW FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%PI PHI FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%FIELD OF JOY MINISTRIES: $1k → 10%FIRST RESPONDER: $1k → 13%FAVELL MUSEUM: $3k → 16%PROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL: $3k → 10%ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%SIGMA CHI: $1k → 14%VOO DOO DADDY: $1k → 11%TURTLE BAY EXPLORATION: $1k → 14%BOARD OF VISITORS: $10k → 5%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%KLAMATH COUNTY FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%ILLINOIS WESLEYAN: $3k → 11%BROPHY PREP SCHOOL: $8k → 11%CARENET PREGNANCY CENTER: $1k → 14%OTHER ORGANIZATIONS: $3k → 5%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%ILLINOIS WESLEYAN: $3k → 11%XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 11%TURTLE BAY EXPLORATION: $1k → 14%OTHER ORGANIZATIONS: $1k → 5%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%BROPHY PREP SCHOOL: $5k → 11%BETHEL HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 11%EXODUS FARMS MINISTRY: $1k → 14%XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 11%BETHEL CHURCH: $3k → 14%SHASTA THRIVE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
IA
CA
MO
AZ
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 7 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
20

Total granted

$85k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+49%

Still filing today

29%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureInternationalYouth DevelopmentReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $34k · revenue +47%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $14k
  • BP
    BROPHY PREP SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $13k

Funded once

  • BO
    BOARD OF VISITORS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TD
    TEMPE DIABLOS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +328%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA LAW FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
2
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
5
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
6
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
7
Dallas Baptist University

The purpose of dallas baptist university is to provide christ-centered quality higher education in the arts, sciences, and professional studies at both the undergraduate and graduate levels to traditional age and adult students in order to…

Education
8
Phoenix Seminary Inc

Phoenix seminary's mission is to train men and women for christ-centered ministry for the building of healthy churches in phoenix and the world.

Education
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
12
Texas Wesleyan University

Texas wesleyan university, guided by its deep methodist heritage, provides transformational learning experiences and research opportunities to a diverse group of students to develop their full potential as individuals and as members of the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation; the most unlike its peers is Exodus Farms Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $13,861 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBROPHY PREP SCHOOL: $13,000 · OtherBROPHY PREP SCHOOLXAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $12,000 · OtherXAVIER HIGH SCHOOLBOARD OF VISITORS: $10,000 · OtherBOARD OF VISITORSBETHEL HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherBETHEL HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF IOWA LAW FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherKLAMATH COUNTY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Other+10 more: $14,000 · Other+10 moreTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $34,270 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYPROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,730 · EducationPROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INCUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $2,500 · EducationUniversity of Arizona FoundationTEMPE DIABLOS INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementFAVELL MUSEUM INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureFIELDS OF JOY MINISTRIES: $1,000 · InternationalExodus Farms Ministry: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $500 · ReligionARIZONA CARDINALS FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$79,861Education$44,000Community Improvement$5,000Arts & Culture$3,000International$1,000Youth Development$1,000Religion$500Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $34,270 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAVELL MUSEUM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC: $2,730 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetExodus Farms Ministry: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA CARDINALS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TEMPE DIABLOS INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FAVELL MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS OF JOY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
  • Who funds Exodus Farms Ministry ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA CARDINALS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kintzinger Family Foundation Inc %Stuart J Kintzinger funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kintzinger Family Foundation Inc %Stuart J Kintzinger. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kintzinger Family Foundation Inc %Stuart J Kintzinger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph