Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$825k
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$910kHuman Services$690kEducation$684kEmployment$591kHealth$295kArts & Culture$151kPhilanthropy$135kEnvironment$82kOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $129k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $243k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $453k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE VISION$150,000
CLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL SCHOOL$100,000
IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$52,500
MERCY ONE$50,000
NIACC$50,000
REDEEMER PRESCHOOL$50,000
N IA TRANSITION CENTER$33,333
KINNEY PIONEER MUSEUM$30,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$30,000
SALVATION ARMY$30,000
MASON CITY CHEER FUND$25,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTH IOWA$25,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER IA$20,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$20,000
GARNER CHILD CARE CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Comprehensive Systems: $33k → 12%Comprehensive Systems: $25k → 12%ELDERBRIDGE AGENCY ON AGING: $8k → 12%Comprehensive Systems: $7k → 12%Elderbridge Agency of Aging: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 34 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
62

Total granted

$1.9M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+4%

Still filing today

38%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $212k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    One Vision
    4× · 2019–2024 · $260k · revenue +13%
  • IC
    IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $218k · revenue +0%
  • CS
    COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMS INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $65k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $657k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $597k
  • SA
    schedulle attached
    one grant, 2017 · $586k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa Automotive Heritage Foundation
Science & Tech
2
Iowa Newspaper Association

To improve member newspapers

—
3
Iowa County Fair Incorporated

To provide a youth achievement show.

—
4
Iowa Business Council

The mission of the iowa business council is to engage the personal commitment of its executive members in active leadership roles on major initiatives that offer opportuinities to enhance iowa's overall economic vitality.

—
5
Keokuk County Fair

To provide a county fair for rural iowa

—
6
Central Iowa Christian School

Provision of christ centered education with scholastic excellence.

Education
7
Iowa Skilled Trades

Faciltate a team of industry professionals to bring initiatives, education and awareness to skilled trades in iowa

Education
8
Western Iowa Development Assoc

Facilitate economic opportunity, business success, community engagement, prosperity, and quality of life for rural western iowa

—
9
Agribusiness Association of Iowa

The agribusiness association of iowa exists to advocate communicate and educate on behalf of a professional agribusiness industry.

—
10
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
11
Iowa Cooperative Foundation

The iowa cooperative foundation is organized for charitable, scientific and education purposes. the foundation is organized, and will be operated by, exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

—
12
Iowa Rural Development Council

Improvement of opportunities in rural iowa through education and facilitating of collaboration

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Greater Iowa; the most unlike its peers is Grow Rockford Together Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
12/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $657,049 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $596,992 · OtherIndividual grant recipientschedulle attached: $586,155 · Otherschedulle attachedCLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL SCHOOL: $234,700 · OtherCLEAR LAKE CLASSICAL SCHOOLIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $217,500 · OtherIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATIONNIACC: $165,600 · Other+95 more: $1,590,913 · Other+95 moreOne Vision: $260,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMS INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesElderbridge Agency on Aging: $12,520 · Human ServicesWARTBURG COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGE: $20,000 · EducationFOREST CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationMASON CITY DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · EducationUnited Way of North Central Iowa: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTUNE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureRUDD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCAMP HERTKO HOLLOW INC: $24,000 · Youth Development
Other$4,048,909Housing & Shelter$260,000Human Services$77,520Education$52,500Philanthropy$35,000Arts & Culture$30,000Youth Development$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOne Vision: $260,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $217,500 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMS INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH IOWA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $50,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetUnited Way of North Central Iowa: $35,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTUNE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER IOWA: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION: $24,200 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP HERTKO HOLLOW INC: $24,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARING PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $14,055 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetElderbridge Agency on Aging: $12,520 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFLOYD COUNTY FAIR SOCIETY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWINNEBAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetRUDD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetFOREST CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEVADA FOUNDATION BRETT BARKER PRESIDENT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSTEBENS CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $4,410 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGROW ROCKFORD TOGETHER ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetMASON CITY DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetNORTH IOWA FAIR ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds One Vision ↗
  • Who funds IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH IOWA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds United Way of North Central Iowa ↗
  • Who funds TUNE INC ↗
  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER IOWA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HERTKO HOLLOW INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Citizens Bank Charitable FoundationIA45.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · Farrer Endowment Foundation · Dorothy Ann Weitzel and Thomas F W · The David & Phyllis Murphy Charitable Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · John K and Luise V Hanson Foundation · Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust · Winnebago Industries Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Lee Endowment Foundation · United Way of North Central Iowa

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kinney-Lindstrom Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kinney-Lindstrom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph