· Private foundation
Kings Daughters Benevolent Assn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NASHUA SCHOOL DISTRICT | $25,103 |
| END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER | $24,744 |
| VARIOUS CONTRACTORS | $6,104 |
| NASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER | $3,395 |
| MICROSOCIETY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL | $2,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,750 |
| VARIOUS DOCTOR'S OFFICES | $2,108 |
| WAYPOINT - SUMMER CAMP | $2,034 |
| GIRLS INC OF NEW HAMPSHIRE | $2,000 |
| NASHUA CHILDRENS HOME | $1,108 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- E6END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER5× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +111%
- CCCOPPER CANNON CORPORATION5× · 2017–2022 · $18k · revenue +51%
- NCNASHUA CHILDREN'S HOME7× · 2019–2025 · $16k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- SJSt Joseph Hospitalone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +16%
- AFACADEMY FOR SCIENCE & DESIGNgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +60%
- SASALVATION ARMY CAMPERSHIPSone grant, 2024 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide non-denominational non-sectarian pre-school and daycare programs serving the general public.
To provide a secondary education for children
Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…
New hampton school cultivates lifelong learners who will serve as active global citizens. new hampton school promotes literature, science & useful arts education to students in grades 9 through post-graduate.
The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…
Concord Christian Academy is a life preparatory educational institution that works in harmony with families to promote the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, physical and creative growth of students, empowering them to live for the glory…
The mission is to facilitate the unfolding of each child's unique potential through an outstanding montessori education that enables a child to meet future challenges, and that encourages a love of learning, independent thinking, social…
Operation of a public charter school.
Mountain Village is a public Nature-based, Montessori school, engaging students in experiences that integrate natural environments with the Montessori curriculum, igniting achievement in academic, social-emotional and physical development.
Operations of state wide interscholastic activities involving member schools and their students
Co-operative nursery school
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashua Children's Home and the most unlike its peers is Stepping Stones. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
- Who funds COPPER CANNON CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NASHUA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds NASHUA SOUP KITCHEN & SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds Nashua Community Music School ↗
- Who funds MICRO SOCIETY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds St Joseph Hospital ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY FOR SCIENCE & DESIGN ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Nashua Inc · Ann de Nicola Tuw · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Tamposi Foundation · The Barker Foundation Inc · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kings Daughters Benevolent Assn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kings Daughters Benevolent Assn?
Find your warmest path to Kings Daughters Benevolent Assn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.