· Public charity
Kingman Healthcare Inc
To inspire and partner with our community to achieve optimal health mind, body and spirit.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $172,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $403,393 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $230,893 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $152k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MSTEPP INC | $35,000 |
| KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE | $24,000 |
| KINGMAN AREA FOOD BANK | $18,000 |
| NORTHERN LIGHTS MINISTRY | $15,000 |
| KATHRYN HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| KINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT | $13,000 |
| CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC | $12,000 |
| KINGMAN CARES | $10,000 |
| KINGSMEN OF ROUTE 66 INC DBA THE KINGSMEN | $10,000 |
| KINGMANS HEALING HOOVES INC | $8,500 |
| YUCCA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY | $6,000 |
| ARIZONA YOUTH PARTNERSHIP | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $399k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KAKINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE8× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +74%
- CMCornerstone Mission Project Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +93%
- KCKINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT8× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- SISheStrong Incone grant, 2022 · $11k
- GCGENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTone grant, 2021 · $10k
- SOState of Arizonaone grant, 2020 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mohave county historical society maintains a museum in kingman, arizona to collect and display historical objects and to increase and distribute knowledge and appreciation of the history of the area.
To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.
Operate food bank and provide food, housing, and utility assistance to those in need.
Child & Family Services provides a wide continuum of outpatient services for children and thier families with behavioral/mental health needs, in aspiration of fulfilling the family's individualized goals. Right Turn provides transitional…
Provide services for the elderly
Provide service and charity in our community, with a focus on improving the lives of women and children.
Arizonas Family to the Homeless Inc relies solely upon the generosity and commitment of our community members to provide critical services to our homeless & low income families; and we gratefully accept your tax-deductible financial and…
Provide the community with volunteer services
Promote and support housing and work opportunities to veterans, low-income families, addicts, and people on probation
To run the historical theatre
To foster the physical, mental, and emotional growth and development of the greater kingman, arizona area youth through the sport of soccer at all levels of age and competition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kingman Aid to Abused People and the most unlike its peers is Kathryn Heidenreich Adult Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds Kathryn Heidenreich Adult Center ↗
- Who funds MSTEPP INC ↗
- Who funds Cornerstone Mission Project Inc ↗
- Who funds KINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT ↗
- Who funds THE CLUB FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Arizona Youth Partnership ↗
- Who funds KINGMAN AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds KINGMANS HEALING HOOVES INC ↗
- Who funds Jerry Ambrose Veterans Council of Mohave County ↗
- Who funds Yucca community Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds SheStrong Inc ↗
- Who funds Kingsmen of Route 66 Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Woodmark Foundation Inc · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · River Cities United Way · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Arizona Food Bank Network · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kingman Healthcare Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.