Skip to content

· Public charity

Kingman Healthcare Inc

To inspire and partner with our community to achieve optimal health mind, body and spirit.

$403k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$333kHealth$249kHousing & Shelter$126kFood & Nutrition$71kYouth Development$70kReligion$15kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $172,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $403,393 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $230,893 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $152k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$453M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSTEPP INC$35,000
KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE$24,000
KINGMAN AREA FOOD BANK$18,000
KATHRYN HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER INC$15,000
NORTHERN LIGHTS MINISTRY$15,000
KINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT$13,000
CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC$12,000
KINGSMEN OF ROUTE 66 INC DBA THE KINGSMEN$10,000
KINGMAN CARES$10,000
KINGMANS HEALING HOOVES INC$8,500
ARIZONA YOUTH PARTNERSHIP$6,000
YUCCA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $399k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $24k → 17%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $24k → 17%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $24k → 17%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $23k → 17%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $22k → 17%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $22k → 17%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $21k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION: $15k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION: $12k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION: $12k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION: $12k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION: $11k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION: $11k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION: $11k → 17%KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $24k → 17%KATHERINE HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER: $15k → 17%KATHERINE HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER: $15k → 17%KATHERINE HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER: $15k → 17%KATHRYN HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER INC: $15k → 17%KATHERINE HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER: $15k → 17%KATHERINE HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER: $15k → 17%KATHERINE HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER: $15k → 17%KATHERINE HEIDENREICH ADULT CENTER: $15k → 17%CORNERSTONE MISSION PROJECT INC: $12k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$804k · 11 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$804k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

91%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyPublic BenefitFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KA
    KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +74%
  • CM
    Cornerstone Mission Project Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +93%
  • KC
    KINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • SI
    SheStrong Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • GC
    GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SO
    State of Arizona
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mohave County Historical Society

The mohave county historical society maintains a museum in kingman, arizona to collect and display historical objects and to increase and distribute knowledge and appreciation of the history of the area.

—
2
Southeastern Arizona Community Unique Services

To provide services to the elderly and disabled in the form of congregate and home delivered meals, housekeeping services, in-home nursing care, home health aides, and other services.

Health
3
Kingman Area Ministries Inc

Operate food bank and provide food, housing, and utility assistance to those in need.

Religion
4
Child & Family Services of Yuma Inc

Child & Family Services provides a wide continuum of outpatient services for children and thier families with behavioral/mental health needs, in aspiration of fulfilling the family's individualized goals. Right Turn provides transitional…

Human Services
5
Kingman County Council On Aging Inc

Provide services for the elderly

Human Services
6
Venture Club of Kingman Inc

Provide service and charity in our community, with a focus on improving the lives of women and children.

—
7
Arizonas Family to the Homeless

Arizonas Family to the Homeless Inc relies solely upon the generosity and commitment of our community members to provide critical services to our homeless & low income families; and we gratefully accept your tax-deductible financial and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Volunteer Center of Kern County Inc

Provide the community with volunteer services

Philanthropy
9
Reach for It of Tucson Inc

Promote and support housing and work opportunities to veterans, low-income families, addicts, and people on probation

Housing & Shelter
10
Kingman Community Theatre

To run the historical theatre

Arts & Culture
11
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
12
Kingman Youth Soccer League

To foster the physical, mental, and emotional growth and development of the greater kingman, arizona area youth through the sport of soccer at all levels of age and competition

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kingman Aid to Abused People; the most unlike its peers is Kathryn Heidenreich Adult Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $183,300 · Human ServicesKINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLEKathryn Heidenreich Adult Center: $120,000 · Human ServicesKathryn Heidenreich Adult CenterCornerstone Mission Project Inc: $95,445 · Human ServicesCornerstone Mission Project IncTHE CLUB FOR YOUTH: $57,000 · OtherTHE CLUB FOR YOUTHKINGMAN AREA FOOD BANK: $38,000 · OtherKINGMAN AREA FOOD BA…NORTHERN LIGHTS MINISTRY: $15,000 · OtherNORTHERN LIGHTS MINI…GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST: $10,000 · OtherGENERAL CONFERENCE O…Kingsmen of Route 66 Inc: $10,000 · OtherKingsmen of Route 66…KINGMAN CARES: $10,000 · OtherKINGMAN CARESState of Arizona: $9,000 · OtherState of ArizonaThe kingsmen: $6,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $6,000 · OtherMSTEPP INC: $105,000 · HealthMSTEPP INCArizona Youth Partnership: $43,500 · HealthArizona Youth Partne…SheStrong Inc: $10,500 · HealthSheStrong IncKINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT: $95,000 · PhilanthropyKINGMAN CANC…KINGMANS HEALING HOOVES INC: $29,000 · Recreation & SportsJerry Ambrose Veterans Council of Mohave County: $20,000 · Public BenefitYucca community Food Pantry: $17,400 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$398,745Other$161,000Health$159,000Philanthropy$95,000Recreation & Sports$29,000Public Benefit$20,000Food & Nutrition$17,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE: $183,300 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetKathryn Heidenreich Adult Center: $120,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetMSTEPP INC: $105,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCornerstone Mission Project Inc: $95,445 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetKINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT: $95,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetTHE CLUB FOR YOUTH: $57,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetArizona Youth Partnership: $43,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKINGMAN AREA FOOD BANK: $38,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetKINGMANS HEALING HOOVES INC: $29,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetJerry Ambrose Veterans Council of Mohave County: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYucca community Food Pantry: $17,400 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetSheStrong Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetKingsmen of Route 66 Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KINGMAN AID TO ABUSED PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds Kathryn Heidenreich Adult Center ↗
  • Who funds MSTEPP INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone Mission Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds KINGMAN CANCER CARE UNIT ↗
  • Who funds THE CLUB FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Youth Partnership ↗
  • Who funds KINGMAN AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds KINGMANS HEALING HOOVES INC ↗
  • Who funds Jerry Ambrose Veterans Council of Mohave County ↗
  • Who funds Yucca community Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds SheStrong Inc ↗
  • Who funds Kingsmen of Route 66 Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Woodmark Foundation IncVA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Woodmark Foundation Inc · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · River Cities United Way · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · Arizona Food Bank Network · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kingman Healthcare Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kingman Healthcare Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kingman Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph