Skip to content
Kingdom Missions Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kingdom Missions Fund

To fund christian missions projects worldwide.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$41kFood & Nutrition$26kInternational$18kHuman Services$8kYouth Development$6kEmployment$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $23,823, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,377 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,554 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$680k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN PROMISE INTERNATIONAL$11,823
EQUIPNET INTERNATIONAL$6,000
KEITH THOMAS MINISTRIES$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%URBAN PROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 12%ISLAND ENCOUNTERS: $8k → 22%URBAN PROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $9k → 12%URBAN PROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 4 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$67k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    URBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue -47%
  • TM
    Ten14 Ministries
    5× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue -55%
  • KT
    KEITH THOMAS MINISTRIES
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • UI
    URBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +21%
  • IE
    Island Encounters
    3× · 2020–2022 · $8k · revenue -45%
  • SS
    Sowing Seeds of Joy
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
2
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
3
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
4
Transform Ministries
—
5
Unify Ministries
Religion
6
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
7
Upreach Ministry International Inc
—
8
Kingdom Bridges Ministries

To serve and strengthen churches ministries and charitable organizations by facilitating global partnerships that seek to alleviate human suffering by seeing heaven touch earth one partnership at a time. We feed clothe and shelter the most…

Religion
9
Equipping Network

Equipping Network is a non-profit ministry which will train underservedShepherds in Biblical principles of ministry and family.

Human Services
10
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
11
Equippers Group International

To produce and publish training materials for church leadership and development. To facilitate churches groups and individual participation in world mission.

Religion
12
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urbanpromise International; the most unlike its peers is Island Encounters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ten14 Ministries: $16,050 · ReligionTen14 MinistriesKEITH THOMAS MINISTRIES: $12,300 · ReligionKEITH THOMAS MINISTRIESEQUIPNET: $12,100 · ReligionEQUIPNETSowing Seeds of Joy: $6,070 · ReligionSowing Seeds of JoyYOUR MISSION MATTERS: $5,040 · ReligionYOUR MISSION MATTERSURBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $26,483 · Human ServicesURBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES COMMUNITY DE…Island Encounters: $8,360 · Human ServicesIsland EncountersURBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $12,185 · InternationalURBANPROMISE INTERN…SERVANT PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $6,060 · InternationalSERVANT PROJECT INT…
Religion$51,560Human Services$34,843International$18,245

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetURBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $26,483 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetTen14 Ministries: $16,050 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetKEITH THOMAS MINISTRIES: $12,300 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetURBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL: $12,185 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEQUIPNET: $12,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIsland Encounters: $8,360 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSowing Seeds of Joy: $6,070 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSERVANT PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $6,060 over 1y, 12% of budgetYOUR MISSION MATTERS: $5,040 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kingdom Missions Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kingdom Missions Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kingdom Missions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home