Skip to content

· Private foundation

King Ranch Family Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$613k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.4MHuman Services$770kYouth Development$553kCrime & Legal$521kEducation$333kArts & Culture$311kRecreation & Sports$236kFood & Nutrition$99kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $435k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HALO Flight$89,500
WOMEN'S MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF SO$65,000
FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES$45,000
South TX Family Planning Health Cor$43,000
Brush Country CASA$40,000
Cenikor$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE$30,000
Children's Advocacy Cntr of the Coa$30,000
Friends of the Public Library$25,450
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-SOUTH TX COUN$25,000
THE PURPLE DOOR$25,000
Foster Angels of South Texas$25,000
SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING$20,000
KLEBERG COUNTY ADULT LITERACY$20,000
Weavers of Love$19,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $648k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $45k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $45k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $45k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $45k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $40k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $35k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $35k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $35k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICES: $28k → 17%Foster Angels of South Texas: $25k → 17%Foster Angels of South Texas: $25k → 17%Foster Angels of South Texas: $25k → 17%Foster Angels of South Texas: $20k → 17%Foster Angels of South Texas: $20k → 17%Foster Angels of South Texas: $15k → 17%Foster Angels of South Texas: $15k → 17%Mission of Mercy: $25k → 17%Mission of Mercy: $25k → 17%Mission of Mercy: $25k → 17%Mission of Mercy: $25k → 17%Mission of Mercy: $25k → 17%Mission of Mercy: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 29 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
8

Total granted

$4.1M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+116%

Still filing today

52%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $353k · revenue +35%
  • CO
    CASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $300k · revenue +83%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +116%
  • TA
    Texas AM University-Kingsville Fnd
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • EE
    EPIPHANY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
2
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
3
Casa of Deep East Texas Inc

Train volunteers to advocate for children in court directed foster care.

Crime & Legal
4
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
5
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
6
Central Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Pregnancy counseling

Human Services
7
Foster Angels of Central Texas Foundation

The organizations mission is to improve the lives of the children in foster care in central texas.

Human Services
8
Texoma Family Shelter

Feed and house homeless families, counsel and help them prepare for job interviews, assist in completing forms for govt assistance, and provide rent/utilities assistance. Coordinate with local food bank.

Human Services
9
Casa of West Texas

The mission of casa of west texas is to recruit, train and support committed volunteers who are appointed by the court to advocate for the best interest of children in the foster care system.

Civil Rights
10
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
12
Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc

To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foster Angels of South Texas Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kingsville Symphony Orchestra Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMEN'S MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF SO: $525,000 · OtherWOMEN'S MEN'S HEALTH SERVICES OF SOBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE INC: $265,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE INCChildren's Advocacy Cntr of the Coa: $221,450 · OtherChildren's Advocacy Cntr of the CoaBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-SOUTH TX COUN: $220,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-SOUTH TX COUNWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $220,000 · OtherWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXASFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $216,500 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETESChristus Spohn Health System Founda: $197,516 · OtherChristus Spohn Health System FoundaHALO FLIGHT INC: $139,067 · Other+20 more: $689,822 · Other+20 moreFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $353,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY COUNSELING …FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $168,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER ANGELS OF S…MISSION OF MERCY INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF MERCY I…NEW LIFE REFUGE MINISTRIES: $23,532 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I: $180,000 · Arts & CultureKingsville Symphony Orchestra Society: $125,000 · Arts & CultureCASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY: $300,000 · Crime & LegalKleberg County Adult Literacy Council: $149,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation: $50,000 · EducationWeavers of Love Inc: $99,069 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL BEND WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · Health
Other$2,694,355Human Services$699,532Arts & Culture$305,000Crime & Legal$300,000Education$199,000Food & Nutrition$99,069Health$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $353,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetCASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY: $300,000 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE INC: $265,000 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetWOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $220,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I: $180,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $168,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKleberg County Adult Literacy Council: $149,000 over 9y, 45% of budgetHALO FLIGHT INC: $139,067 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetKingsville Symphony Orchestra Society: $125,000 over 9y, 45% of budgetWeavers of Love Inc: $99,069 over 8y, 13% of budgetFriends of the Public Library: $68,370 over 3y, 24% of budgetCENIKOR FOUNDATION: $62,426 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE REFUGE MINISTRIES: $23,532 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOASTAL BEND WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF KLEBERG COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S SHELTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM I ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Kleberg County Adult Literacy Council ↗
  • Who funds HALO FLIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Kingsville Symphony Orchestra Society ↗
  • Who funds Weavers of Love Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Public Library ↗
  • Who funds CENIKOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE REFUGE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Aranzazu Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial FoundationTX30× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · Robert J & Helen C Kleberg Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Celanese Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · Bc & Addie Brookshire Kleberg County Charitable Foundation · Puente de Maravillas Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization King Ranch Family Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from King Ranch Family Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on King Ranch Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph