· Public charity
Kind Inc
To assist and protect unaccompanied children who are parties to judicial or regulatory proceedings arising from the immigration laws of the u.s., whether in the context of removal proceedings or applications from asylum or otherwise, by providing pro bono legal representation and by other means, to examine practices by which children's…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $3,810,615 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,918,978 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,108,363 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k1 grant · $192k
- $250k+7 grants · $3.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY | $823,750 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE | $573,750 |
| MORRIS COUNTY ORGANIZATION FOR HISPANIC AFFAIRS INC | $543,750 |
| CAMDEN CENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE | $538,750 |
| MAKE THE ROAD NEW JERSEY | $441,115 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK | $398,750 |
| THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHT | $298,750 |
| RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $192,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MTMake The Road States Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +154%
- MCMORRIS COUNTY ORGANIZATION FOR HISPANIC AFFAIRS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +60%
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK4× · 2021–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +83%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides legal advocacy, education and training services, public policy development, information sharing, and community empowerment programs.
Provide high-quality legal services in a compassionate, incarnational, and culturally-appropriate way and empower churches to serve their sojourner neighbors well through collaborative partnerships.
To embrace the gospel value of welcoming the stranger by promoting the dignity and protecting the rights of immigrants in partnership with a dedicated network of catholic and community legal immigration programs.
Promoting, assisting and supporting the sustainability and growth of casa programs in new jersey. casa programs promote the protection of abused and neglected children by using trained volunteers to advocate for these children in courts…
Provide free or low cost legal assistance to latino asylum-seekers.
La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Njcic is a state-wide legal services and policy advocacy organization dedicated to empowering young immigrants. we provide holistic, youth-centered legal representation, drive systemic change to advance immigrant rights, build community…
Catholic migration services (cms) is a non profit organization providing quality legal services to immigrants primarily in brooklyn and queens, regardless of race, ethnicity, and religion. catholic migration services is focused on…
Provides immigration legal services to persons who are otherwise financially incapable of obtaining such services.
To advocate for immigrants rights in the workplace by providing workers with support in situations of workplace injustice.
New york justice for our neighbors welcomes immigrants into our communities with compassion, dignity, and love by providing free high-quality immigration legal services to low-income and vulnerable immigrants, education to communities of…
To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morris County Organization for Hispanic Affairs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds Make The Road States Inc ↗
- Who funds MORRIS COUNTY ORGANIZATION FOR HISPANIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCDIOCESE OF NEWARK ↗
- Who funds CAMDEN CTR FOR LAW & SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE IN MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kind Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Catholic Charities of the Arcdiocese of Newark — 1% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.