Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kimmel-Spiller Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$107kEducation$28kPhilanthropy$16kHuman Services$9kArts & Culture$8kReligion$6kCivil Rights$5kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMMIT ELKS CHARITABLE FUND$2,000
FIRST STATE BALLET THEATER$1,000
CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE: $2k → 10%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST: $160 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
VA
DE
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 14 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
33

Total granted

$102k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+26%

Still filing today

43%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER DELAWARE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue +87%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +33%
  • FS
    FIRST STATE BALLET THEATRE INC
    2× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • JM
    JACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue +57%
  • CC
    CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • JE
    JEFFERSON EINSTEIN HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
4
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
5
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
8
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Federation of Detroit

The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
10
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
11
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
12
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children and Families First; the most unlike its peers is Rabbi Without Walls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $13,650 · OtherEINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORKRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER DELAWARE INC: $12,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER DELAWARE INCJACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY: $12,000 · OtherJACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMYCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH: $10,000 · OtherCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTHJEFFERSON EINSTEIN HOSPITAL: $6,000 · OtherHELEN F GRAHAM CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5,000 · OtherRABBI WITHOUT WALLS: $5,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INC: $4,500 · OtherEDNA Y SCHWARTZ SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $4,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $4,300 · Other+23 more: $29,525 · Other+23 moreCANCER CARE CONNECTION: $20,000 · HealthCANCER CARE CONNECTIONTRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $13,500 · HealthTRANSPLANT FOUNDATIONAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association …BAYHEALTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $2,500 · Health+3 more: $3,000 · Health+3 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $5,650 · PhilanthropyRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · PhilanthropyEDWARD TAYLOR COOMBS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKIMMEL CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST STATE BALLET THEATRE INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureWILMINGTON BALLET ACADEMY OF THE DANCE INC: $500 · Arts & CultureJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $1,030 · Human Services+1 more: $160 · Human ServicesANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 · Civil RightsB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$121,475Health$49,000Philanthropy$16,150Arts & Culture$7,000Human Services$5,190Civil Rights$5,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER CARE CONNECTION: $20,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTRANSPLANT FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER DELAWARE INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $5,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDWARD TAYLOR COOMBS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetKIMMEL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRABBI WITHOUT WALLS: $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYHEALTH FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STATE BALLET THEATRE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPreston's March for Energy Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILMINGTON BALLET ACADEMY OF THE DANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILIES FIRST: $160 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Longwood Foundation IncDE26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Longwood Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Delaware · Welfare Foundation Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Happy Difference Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Crestlea Foundation Inc · I Could Do Great Things Foundation · Jewish Federation of Delaware Inc · Incyte Charitable Giving Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kimmel-Spiller Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kimmel-Spiller Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Children and Families First: 87% of income from government
  • Cancer Care Connection: 48% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health System Inc: 43% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Wilmington Ballet Academy of the Dance Inc: 17% of income from government
  • First State Ballet Theatre Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Jewish Federation of Delaware Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Bayhealth Foundation Corporation: 4% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • The Independence School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kimmel-Spiller Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kimmel-Spiller Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kimmel-Spiller’s filings →

More from the funding graph