Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

I Could Do Great Things Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$333k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$4.1MPhilanthropy$2.3MReligion$1.6MInternational$543kPublic Safety & Disaster$330kCivil Rights$246kHuman Services$140kHealth$52kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $515k
  • $250k+2 grants · $635k
$16,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE HILLEL$333,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE$302,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$140,000
THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS$100,000
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$100,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY$100,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$75,000
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$25,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$18,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$18,000
ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOL$16,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$10,000
JEWBELONG$10,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$10,000
SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KIDS AT PLAY FOUNDATION: $2k → 22%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $5k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $3k → 6%BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $500 → 6%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST: $500 → 10%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
MD
DE
KS
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 45% of I Could Do Great Things Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 34% of the giving stays in DE; read by stated purpose it is 14% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

I Could Do Great Things Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.3M · 39 repeat orgs$813k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
58

Total granted

$6.3M
$662k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

69%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $151k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +57%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $345k · revenue +37%
  • SC
    SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $330k · revenue +198%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DELWARE HILLEL
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • KC
    KRISTOL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH OF ISRAEL
    one grant, 2021 · $54k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Nagen Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kids At Play Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%55%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/74
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,491

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/69
Grantees still filing
54/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INC — $1,894,683 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INCCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM — $576,069 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE HILLEL — $431,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE HILLELUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $344,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREUNIVERSITY OF DELWARE HILLEL — $200,000 · Other+70 more — $939,365 · Other+70 moreTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $3,320,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIO…+16 more — $149,011 · EducationAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $30,000 · InternationalFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $20,000 · InternationalTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC — $20,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $18,180 · International+3 more — $5,160 · InternationalJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $297,500 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $76,800 · Philanthropy+2 more — $3,600 · PhilanthropySECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $330,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE NAGEN PROJECT INC — $208,000 · Civil RightsCOMBAT HATE FOUNDATION — $23,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $10,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $5,000 · Civil RightsWOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS — $100,000 · Social Science
Other$4,385,617Education$3,469,011International$543,340Philanthropy$377,900Public Safety & Disaster$330,000Civil Rights$246,000Social Science$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $3,320,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INC — $1,894,683 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $344,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC — $330,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $297,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NAGEN PROJECT INC — $208,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetELKSTONE CARES INC — $119,135 over 2y, 100% of budgetWOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $76,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWBELONG INC — $48,382 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMBAT HATE FOUNDATION — $23,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC — $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $18,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COOPER FOUNDATION INC — $16,560 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRODNEY STREET TENNIS AND TUTORING ASSOCIATION INC — $14,650 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE — $11,905 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRITY FIRST FOR AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT EINSTEIN ACADEMY — $9,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOL — $9,695 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $9,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont Child Care Association Inc — $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC — $7,716 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC — $6,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrap Pond Partners Inc — $4,800 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetTHE MINISTRY OF CARING INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA AND THE DAKOTAS — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE ART MUSEUM INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC — $2,110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DELAWARE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THE NAGEN PROJECT INC
  • Who funds ELKSTONE CARES INC
  • Who funds WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds JEWBELONG INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds ODYSSEY CHARTER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds COMBAT HATE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
  • Who funds THE LAWFARE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds SARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE COOPER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG COLLEGE
  • Who funds RODNEY STREET TENNIS AND TUTORING ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Longwood Foundation IncDE25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Longwood Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Welfare Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Frank and Yetta Chaiken Foundation Inc · Crestlea Foundation Inc · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Kimmel-Spiller Charitable Foundation · The Diane and Harry Levin Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization I Could Do Great Things Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Children and Families First87% of income from government
  • Trap Pond Partners Inc47% of income from government
  • The Ministry of Caring Inc30% of income from government
  • University of Delaware30% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Delaware Inc19% of income from government
  • Delaware Zoological Society Inc16% of income from government
  • Delaware Art Museum Inc8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Jewish Federation of Delaware Inc6% of income from government
  • Odyssey Charter School Inc3% of income from government
  • Odyssey Charter School2% of income from government
  • The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc1% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College1% of income from government
  • Wilmington University Inc1% of income from government
  • Albert Einstein Academy1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to I Could Do Great Things Foundation?

Find your warmest path to I Could Do Great Things Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph