Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kidd Family Foundation

The KIDD FAMILY FOUNDATION is a supporting organization of community foundations, inc.

$98k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Kidd Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Community Foundations Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Kidd Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $90k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
1
18
1
19
4
20
5
21
5
22
3
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$2.2MHuman Services$471kEducation$140kEmployment$48kHealth$25kReligion$10kArts & Culture$10kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $90,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $98,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE$25,000
WARRIORS 4 CHRIST RECOVERY MINISTRIES$15,000
JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF DD$15,000
PARENT BOOSTER USA - JHS DIAMOND CLUB$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $476k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EASTERSEALS CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST: $5k → 15%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $280k → 18%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $58k → 18%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $56k → 18%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $25k → 18%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $25k → 18%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $15k → 18%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $12k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$619k · 3 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$619k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+82%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JACKSON AREA FAMILY ACTIVITIES CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $471k · revenue +41% · 44% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $100k · revenue +47%
  • JI
    J-Vac Industries Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $48k

Funded once

  • GJ
    GALLA JACKSON VINTON JVSD
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • PH
    PLYMOUTH HARBOR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • CU
    CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Agriculteral Extension Camps Inc

4-h camp ohio is a year round resident camp specializing in youth education. the camp serves 13 counties of 4-h groups & 1 state leadership camp. school & outdoor ed groups are the mainstay of the business from march through may & sept…

Youth Development
2
Greater Marion Community Area New Development-Can Do

Promoting growth and expansion of jobs and community benefits for marion city & county

Community Improvement
3
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
4
Defiance College

Defiance College graduates students to lead distinctive lives in their chosen professions through a spirit of service by preparing them to Know, To Understand, To Lead, and To Serve.

Education
5
Paulding County Economic Development Inc

To assist in the retention and creation of jobs, improve local services, broaden the tax base and encourage capital investment in paulding county, ohio.

Public Benefit
6
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
7
Friendship Village of Columbus Ohio Inc

To promote independence, wellness and community for older adults in an active and friendly continuing-care environment.

Human Services
8
Appalachian Center for Economic Networks Inc

The organization is a community based economic development entity serving the 32 counties of appalachia ohio. its mission is to build the capacity of appalachian communities to network, work together and innovate to create a dynamic…

Community Improvement
9
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

10
West Ohio Community Action Partnership

Organized for the purpose of creating, developing and effecting programs and projects designed to enhance the economic development of Allen, Auglaize, and Mercer Counties and its citizens, particularly to those areas of the community and…

Community Improvement
11
Ohio Chamber of Commerce Research Foundation Inc

In order to envision ohio as a place where businesses thrive, communities are safe and strong, and public policy supports economic freedom, the ohio chamber research foundation does its part by promoting a healthy economy in ohio by…

Community Improvement
12
Heart of Ohio Family Health Centers

Our mission is to provide high quality, holistic and compassionate care to meet the healthcare needs of everyone in our diverse community, one heart at a time.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Appalachian Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Jackson County Economic Development Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS INC — $2,239,521 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS INC+1 more — $5,333 · PhilanthropyJACKSON AREA FAMILY ACTIVITIES CENTER — $470,932 · Human ServicesJACKSON AREA FAMIL…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE — $100,000 · EducationJ-Vac Industries Inc — $47,758 · EmploymentGALLA JACKSON VINTON JVSD — $25,000 · OtherCHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $10,000 · OtherPARENT BOOSTER USA INC — $10,000 · OtherWARRIORS 4 CHRIST RECOVERY MINISTRIES — $15,000 · HealthPLYMOUTH HARBOR INC — $10,000 · HealthSOUTHERN HILLS ARTS COUNCIL — $10,000 · Arts & CultureJACKSON COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP — $3,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$2,244,854Human Services$475,932Education$100,000Employment$47,758Other$45,000Health$25,000Arts & Culture$10,000Community Improvement$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS INC — $2,239,521 over 1y, 33% of budgetJACKSON AREA FAMILY ACTIVITIES CENTER — $470,932 over 7y, 44% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS 4 CHRIST RECOVERY MINISTRIES — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPLYMOUTH HARBOR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN HILLS ARTS COUNCIL — $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO — $5,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERSEALS CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST OHIO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations IncOH15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations Inc · Columbus Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kidd Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kidd Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kidd Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph