· Private foundation
Kiblawi Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $99k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL | $32,500 |
| AMERICANS FOR CHILDREN OF THE MIDDLE EAST INC | $31,546 |
| INSTITUTE OF PALESTINIAN STUDIES USA | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| PALESTINE MUSEUM US | $7,000 |
| ARAB AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION | $5,250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| UNRWA USA | $2,000 |
| US CAMPAIGN FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS | $2,000 |
| MUSEUM OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $800 |
| MONDOWEISS | $570 |
| INSTITUTE FOR MIDEAST UNDERSTANDING | $500 |
| ADALAH JUSTICE PROJECT NY | $500 |
| NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +199% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICANS FOR CHILDREN OF THE MIDDLE EAST8× · 2017–2024 · $288k · revenue +103%
- UPUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $226k · revenue +400%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES (USA) INC5× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +124%
Funded once
AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +26%- GGOFUNDMEORGone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -70%
- AFAAJ FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
The organization is dedicated to social engagement, cultural preservation, and advocacy for the rights and prosperity of gaza palestinians in the united states and in gaza, palestine.
Educate elected officials, policy-makers, and voters and advocate in congress and the executive branch for us policies that advance palestinian right and freedom.
The middle east policy council is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan eductional organization. founded in 1981, the mission of the council is to foster public discussion of the political, economic, cultural and security issues that…
We will utilize every resource available so that the realities in palestine and palestinian voices are raised and heard. we wish to change the conversation in washington, dc from a zionist centered one, to one that focuses on the wellbeing…
The organization is an international community of scholars dedicated to promoting academic integrity in the study of the middle east, particularly with regard to the conflict between israel and its arab neighbors.
Al-shabaka: the palestinian policy network is an independent, non-partisan, and non-profit organization whose mission is to convene a multidisciplinary, global network of palestinian analysts to produce critical policy analysis and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Palestinian Appeal Inc and the most unlike its peers is American University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR CHILDREN OF THE MIDDLE EAST ↗
- Who funds UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES (USA) INC ↗
- Who funds Palestine Museum US Corporation ↗
- Who funds ARAB AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Education For Just Peace in Middle East ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST UNDERSTANDING ↗
- Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds CHURCHES FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE ↗
- Who funds ARAB AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PALESTINIAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEAL PALESTINE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Andoni Family Foundation · The Salem Family Foundation Inc · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Eissa a Bateh & Brothers Foundation Inc · Cultures of Resistance Network Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kiblawi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.