· Private foundation
The Andoni Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $71k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTLAND GOODFELLOWS INC | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID INC | $10,000 |
| ARAB AMERICA FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| ST GEORGE ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH | $5,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE SERVICES FOUNDAT | $5,000 |
| EDUCATION FOR PEACE & UNDERSTANDNG | $5,000 |
| MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TIDES CENTER | $5,000 |
| BEIT SAHOUR USA ORGANIZATION | $5,000 |
| UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC | $5,000 |
| THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST UNDERSTANDING | $4,000 |
| MUSEUM OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE | $4,000 |
| PALESTINE AID SOCIETY OF AMERICA | $3,000 |
| EMPOWERMENT WORKS INC | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAARAB AMERICA FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +398%
- BSBEIT SAHOUR USA ORGANIZATION5× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +145%
AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID6× · 2019–2024 · $21k · revenue +215%
Funded once
- UPUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +252%
- AAMIDEASTone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -20%
- KIKIDNEYS IN COMMONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -98%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization is dedicated to social engagement, cultural preservation, and advocacy for the rights and prosperity of gaza palestinians in the united states and in gaza, palestine.
The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee ADC is a civil rights organization committed to defending the rights of people of Arab descent and promoting their rich cultural heritage.
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
Educate elected officials, policy-makers, and voters and advocate in congress and the executive branch for us policies that advance palestinian right and freedom.
Pama is a humanitarian nonprofit, non political and charitable organization aiming to promote educational achievements and expertise of palestinian health care professionals with a goal opromoting health care in palestine.
Extend raises the voices of Palestinians and Israelis working for democracy and human rights.
The middle east policy council is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan eductional organization. founded in 1981, the mission of the council is to foster public discussion of the political, economic, cultural and security issues that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Palestinian Appeal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Loudoun Freedom Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARAB AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEIT SAHOUR USA ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN WOMEN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MYOTONIC DYSTROPHY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST UNDERSTANDING ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTLAND GOODFELLOWS INC ↗
- Who funds Empowerment Works Inc ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMIDEAST ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOR PEACE & UNDERSTANDING ↗
- Who funds UNRWA USA NATIONAL COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDNEYS IN COMMON ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PALESTINE STUDIES (USA) INC ↗
- Who funds PALESTINE AID SOCIETY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PALESTINIAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARAB AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAYA WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds MATCHINGDONORSORG INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR CHILDREN OF THE MIDDLE EAST ↗
- Who funds PLAYGROUNDS FOR PALESTINE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NAZARETH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ADC RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LOUDOUN FREEDOM CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kiblawi Foundation · The Salem Family Foundation Inc · Arab Community Center for Economic and S · Foundation for Middle East Peace · Drs Subhi & Maysoon Ali Foundation Inc · Eissa a Bateh & Brothers Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Andoni Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.