Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$153kHuman Services$67kEnvironment$65kAnimals$40kReligion$35kScience & Tech$30kPhilanthropy$24kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American River Conservancy$55,000
Silicon Valley Korea U Alumni Association$20,000
Boston College Law School$10,000
Success Economy Institute$10,000
Bay Area KGroup$10,000
museLIVE Inc$5,000
Natures Nursery$5,000
Jesuit Volunteer Corps$5,000
Boll Family YMCA$5,000
Sewhope Inc$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 70% of grant dollars ($330k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($139k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $20k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
DC
AL
FL

Beyond the US: 30% of all-years giving ($139k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Afghanistan$89k · 8 grants
South Korea$50k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$387k · 13 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$387k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

31%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalScience & TechEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YH
    YangChung High School Alumni Assoc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $68k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue -66%
  • BC
    Boston College Law School
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • NW
    Namyangju Welfare Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
Help Animals India

Help Animals India is a 501c3 organization dedicated to improving the lives and welfare of animals by providing financial and consultation to support and build capacity of animal rescue groups in India and Nepal while connecting donors…

Animals
3
Women United for Animal Welfare

Cultivating the empowerment of women globally who promote animal activism and welfare. women united. men invited

Animals
4
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
5
Awasa

Reduce animal euthanasia by providing free spay and neuters, free shots, pet food and public education

Animals
6
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
7
War Relief Ukraine Ngo

War Relief Ukraine is a non-profit organization with a mission to improve the lives of those impacted by the ongoing hostilities in Ukraine. Our goal is to provide much-needed relief to the innocent victims of the conflict.

International
8
Project Hope Animal Rescue

Animal welfare

Animals
9
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
10
Beach Dog Rescue of Costa Maya Mexico Inc

Beach Dog Rescue of Costa Maya Mexico, Inc. was formed with a single purpose - to help end the suffering of homeless dogs in Costa Maya, Mexico. Tens of thousands of homeless, starving, sick and injured street dogs struggle to survive on…

Animals
11
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
12
Good Karma Pet Rescue Inc

To provide rescue,foster,rehabilitation and adoption of domesticated pets to promote humane responsable pet ownership and to increase awareness and provide solutions fo pet over-population issues.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sewhope Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bay Area K-Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YangChung High School Alumni Assoc: $67,816 · OtherYangChung High School Alumni AssocBoston College Law School: $40,000 · OtherBoston College Law SchoolJesuit Volunteer Corps: $35,000 · OtherJesuit Volunteer CorpsSilicon Valley Korea U Alumni Association: $30,000 · OtherSilicon Valley Korea U Alumni AssociationSuccess Economy Institute: $20,000 · OtherSuccess Economy InstituteSanta Clara County Community Colleg: $20,000 · OtherSanta Clara County Community CollegCommunity Chest of Korea: $18,902 · OtherCommunity Chest of KoreamuseLIVE Inc: $10,000 · OtherNamyangju Welfare Foundation: $10,000 · OtherBoll Family YMCA: $10,000 · Other+5 more: $32,250 · Other+5 moreAMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY: $65,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVER …THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERI…NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $10,000 · AnimalsNATURES N…Humane World for Animals Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsHumane Wo…Karma Rescue: $10,000 · AnimalsKarma Res…BAY AREA K-GROUP INC: $30,000 · Science & TechWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSEWHOPE INC: $5,000 · InternationalHUT OUTREACH: $5,000 · International
Other$293,968Environment$65,000Animals$40,000Science & Tech$30,000Human Services$30,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBAY AREA K-GROUP INC: $30,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKarma Rescue: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHUT OUTREACH: $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVER CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA K-GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds Karma Rescue ↗
  • Who funds SEWHOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUT OUTREACH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo’s filings →

More from the funding graph