Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2025
16
Organizations funded FY2024
63%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$55,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 16
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$2.4M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 63% of the organizations Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 52% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentScience & TechHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$130k10%
FY202416$145k63%
FY202310$120k70%
FY20222$20k50%
FY20214$45k100%
FY20201$9kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$153kHuman Services$67kEnvironment$65kAnimals$40kReligion$35kScience & Tech$30kPhilanthropy$24kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
DC
AL
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
American River Conservancy$65,00020%
Bay Area K-Group Inc$30,000411%
Wounded Warrior Project Inc$30,00020%
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals$10,00010%
Natures Nursery Center for Wildlife Rehab & Consr$10,00021%
Humane World for Animals Inc$10,00010%
Karma Rescue$10,00012%
Sewhope Inc$5,0001n/a
Dreamtoe Youth Ballet Company$5,0001n/a
Hut Outreach$5,00017%

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($289k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican River Conservancy: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area K-Group Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetWounded Warrior Project Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNatures Nursery Center for Wildlife Rehab & Consr: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKarma Rescue: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHut Outreach: $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation with peer funders

About Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation

How much does Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation give?
Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $130,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 16 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (33%), Human Services (14%), Environment (14%).
Who are Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: American River Conservancy ($65k), Bay Area K-Group Inc ($30k), Wounded Warrior Project Inc ($30k).
Does Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 63% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation based?
Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ki Hyun Joo and Kyung Don Joo’s filings →

More from the funding graph