Skip to content
Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40 at a glance

· Private foundation

Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$2.1MFood & Nutrition$1.7MEnvironment$685kPhilanthropy$365kEducation$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $240k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $945k
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Good Food Institute$200,000
International Anti-Poaching Foundation$100,000
The Humane League$100,000
Accountability Board$100,000
Center for A Humane Economy$100,000
National Philanthropic Trust$100,000
Humane America Animal Foundation$85,000
Mercy For Animals$60,000
ProVeg International$50,000
Beyond Carnism$50,000
Dawnwatch$45,000
Animal Charity Evaluators$35,000
Wild Animal Initiative Inc$25,000
Humane Society of the United States$25,000
Faunalytics$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Accountability Board: $100k → 8%Wild Animal Initiative Inc: $25k → 11%National Philanthropic Trust: $100k → 7%SEE SCHEDULE ATTACHED: $945k → 22%Center for Effective Altruism USA Inc: $40k → 10%Mercy For Animals: $40k → 14%Dawnwatch: $45k → 14%The Good Food Institute: $150k → 14%Beyond Carnism: $50k → 13%International Anti-Poaching Foundation: $75k → 7%Humane Society of the United States: $100k → 8%Mercy For Animals: $60k → 12%Humane America Animal Foundation: $85k → 12%Accountability Board: $90k → 8%National Philanthropic Trust: $95k → 7%International Anti-Poaching Foundation: $100k → 22%Center for Effective Altruism USA Inc: $25k → 10%Animal Charity Evaluators: $80k → 14%Dawnwatch: $45k → 14%The Good Food Institute: $150k → 14%Beyond Carnism: $50k → 13%Humane Society of the United States: $30k → 8%Mercy For Animals: $35k → 12%Humane America Animal Foundation: $80k → 12%Accountability Board: $60k → 8%National Philanthropic Trust: $85k → 7%International Anti-Poaching Foundation: $100k → 22%Animal Charity Evaluators: $35k → 14%Dawnwatch: $35k → 14%The Good Food Institute: $75k → 14%Beyond Carnism: $40k → 13%Center for A Humane Economy: $50k → 8%Mercy For Animals: $35k → 12%Humane America Animal Foundation: $50k → 12%National Philanthropic Trust: $85k → 7%International Anti-Poaching Foundation: $100k → 22%The Good Food Institute: $75k → 14%Beyond Carnism: $25k → 13%Humane Society of the United States: $25k → 8%ProVeg International: $25k → 14%Humane Society of the United States: $25k → 14%White Coat Waste Project: $25k → 14%White Coat Waste Project: $25k → 14%White Coat Waste Project: $25k → 14%White Coat Waste Project: $25k → 14%ProVeg International: $50k → 14%ProVeg International: $50k → 14%ProVeg International: $45k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 20 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$4.5M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+16%

Still filing today

95%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +30%
  • TH
    THE HUMANE LEAGUE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $475k · revenue +110%
  • AI
    AKASHINGA INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $435k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • AW
    A Well-Fed World
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +16%
  • SM
    SENTIENT MEDIAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +235%
  • AD
    ACE - Dharma Voices for Animals
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
3
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
6
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
7
Animal & Vegan Advocacy International Inc

Animal and Vegan Advocacy International, Inc. is dedicated to creating a world in which animals are removed from the food system and other human uses. It furthers this mission by convening advocates through an international conference…

Animals
8
Institute for Animal Happiness

Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…

Animals
9
Global Food Partners Inc

Global food partners ("gfp") is an animal protection organization whose mission is to help food businesses meet their cage-free egg commitments and producers implement cage-free best practices.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Animal Concerns Trust (Fact Inc)

Food animal concerns trust (fact) promotes the safe and humane production of meat, milk, and eggs. fact envisions that all food-producing animals be raised in a healthy and humane manner so that everyone will have access to safe and…

Animals
11
Pax Fauna

Pax fauna exists to design a more effective social movement for animal freedom in the u.s., using original research as well as careful study of social movement literature and the recent history of the animal movement, in order to reverse…

Animals
12
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dawnwatch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HUMANE LEAGUE: $475,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUEAKASHINGA INC: $435,000 · AnimalsAKASHINGA INCHumane World for Animals Inc: $290,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncCENTER FOR A HUMANE ECONOMY INC: $290,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR A HUMANE ECONOMY INCANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS: $280,000 · AnimalsANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORSMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $170,000 · AnimalsMERCY FOR ANIMALS INCDAWNWATCH: $135,000 · AnimalsDAWNWATCHTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC: $135,000 · AnimalsTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC+7 more: $210,000 · Animals+7 moreTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $1,075,000 · Food & NutritionTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INCBEYOND CARNISM INC: $165,000 · Food & NutritionBEYOND CARNISM INC+2 more: $55,000 · Food & NutritionHumane America Animal Foundation: $220,000 · OtherHumane Amer…PROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC: $185,000 · OtherPROVEG INTE…FAUNALYTICS: $70,000 · OtherFAUNALYTICS+1 more: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $365,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD INC: $250,000 · Public BenefitEFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INC: $85,000 · Education
Animals$2,420,000Food & Nutrition$1,295,000Other$485,000Philanthropy$365,000Public Benefit$250,000Education$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $1,075,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $475,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $435,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $365,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $290,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR A HUMANE ECONOMY INC: $290,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS: $280,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetTHE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD INC: $250,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetPROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC: $185,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $170,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBEYOND CARNISM INC: $165,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetDAWNWATCH: $135,000 over 4y, 87% of budgetTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC: $135,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetEFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAUNALYTICS: $70,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetWILD ANIMAL INITIATIVE INC: $65,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFISH WELFARE INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetOUR HEN HOUSE: $40,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAnimal Equality: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEVER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA Well-Fed World: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSENTIENT MEDIA: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Humane America Animal…Rsf Social Finance IncAnimal Charity Evalua…The Greenbaum Foundat…Effective Ventures Fo…Tipping Point Private…The Quinn FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…ImpactassetsincAceso Foundation IncVegfund IncGood Ventures Foundat…
Humane America Animal FoundationCA30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Humane America Animal Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Animal Charity Evaluators · The Greenbaum Foundation · Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · Tipping Point Private Foundation · The Quinn Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Aceso Foundation Inc · Vegfund Inc · Good Ventures Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40?

    Find your warmest path to Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home