· Private foundation
Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $240k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $945k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Good Food Institute | $200,000 |
| National Philanthropic Trust | $100,000 |
| International Anti-Poaching Foundation | $100,000 |
| The Humane League | $100,000 |
| Accountability Board | $100,000 |
| Center for A Humane Economy | $100,000 |
| Humane America Animal Foundation | $85,000 |
| Mercy For Animals | $60,000 |
| ProVeg International | $50,000 |
| Beyond Carnism | $50,000 |
| Dawnwatch | $45,000 |
| Animal Charity Evaluators | $35,000 |
| Wild Animal Initiative Inc | $25,000 |
| Humane Society of the United States | $25,000 |
| Faunalytics | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TGTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +30%
- THTHE HUMANE LEAGUE5× · 2019–2024 · $475k · revenue +110%
- AIAKASHINGA INC5× · 2019–2024 · $435k · revenue +371%
Funded once
- AWA Well-Fed Worldone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +16%
- ADACE - Dharma Voices for Animalsone grant, 2021 · $10k
- SMSENTIENT MEDIAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +235%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.
The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…
Animal and Vegan Advocacy International, Inc. is dedicated to creating a world in which animals are removed from the food system and other human uses. It furthers this mission by convening advocates through an international conference…
Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…
Global food partners ("gfp") is an animal protection organization whose mission is to help food businesses meet their cage-free egg commitments and producers implement cage-free best practices.
Food animal concerns trust (fact) promotes the safe and humane production of meat, milk, and eggs. fact envisions that all food-producing animals be raised in a healthy and humane manner so that everyone will have access to safe and…
Pax fauna exists to design a more effective social movement for animal freedom in the u.s., using original research as well as careful study of social movement literature and the recent history of the animal movement, in order to reverse…
To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dawnwatch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds AKASHINGA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR A HUMANE ECONOMY INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS ↗
- Who funds THE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds PROVEG INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds BEYOND CARNISM INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds DAWNWATCH ↗
- Who funds EFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
- Who funds FAUNALYTICS ↗
- Who funds WILD ANIMAL INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds FISH WELFARE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds VEGAN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds OUR HEN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Animal Equality ↗
- Who funds LEVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A Well-Fed World ↗
- Who funds SENTIENT MEDIA ↗
- Who funds HUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Humane America Animal Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Animal Charity Evaluators · The Greenbaum Foundation · Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · Tipping Point Private Foundation · The Quinn Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Aceso Foundation Inc · Vegfund Inc · Good Ventures Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40?
Find your warmest path to Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.