Skip to content

· Private foundation

Key Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$321k
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$949kEnvironment$248kCivil Rights$179kFood & Nutrition$146kHealth$82kArts & Culture$78kEducation$38kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k39 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $215k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$30,000
CENTRAL PA FOOD BANK$25,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$25,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$20,000
ACLU$15,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$15,000
PROPUBLICA$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
RAINFOREST FOUNDATION$10,000
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE$10,000
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS$10,000
EARTHJUSTICE$10,000
RAICES$10,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$10,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%HYDE PARK REFUGEE PROJECT: $1k → 14%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%THE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES: $100 → 12%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $5k → 14%THE FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 54 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
12

Total granted

$1.3M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+23%

Still filing today

81%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $163k · revenue +89%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $157k · revenue +80%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK
    7× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • BI
    B'TSELEM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • AJ
    A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue +188%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hyde Park Refugee Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/63
Grantees still filing
48/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW ISRAEL FUND: $176,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $175,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $162,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $156,670 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $52,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INCAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $37,500 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $35,000 · International+11 more: $104,000 · International+11 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $83,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOUR…EARTHJUSTICE: $33,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICECLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $32,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $26,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL …CENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $15,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR CAR…EVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE: $12,000 · EnvironmentRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentCITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE: $8,750 · Environment+2 more: $6,950 · EnvironmentACLU: $52,000 · OtherACLUPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $20,500 · OtherOFICINA LEGAL DEL …RAINFOREST FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherRAINFOREST FOUNDAT…MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $18,500 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Res…ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PA: $10,000 · OtherB'TSELEM INC: $10,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE UN…GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $25,000 · OtherGIVEDIRECTLY INCTHE CLEAR FUND: $27,500 · OtherTHE CLEAR FUND+24 more: $43,723 · Other+24 moreCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $110,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $12,500 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $55,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $24,500 · Civil RightsHAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC: $40,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER HARRISBURG INC: $4,500 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthPRO PUBLICA INC: $58,000 · Arts & CultureMARKET SQUARE CONCERTS: $9,900 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $6,290 · Arts & Culture
International$898,670Environment$227,700Other$289,223Food & Nutrition$122,500Civil Rights$79,500Health$74,750Arts & Culture$74,190

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $176,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $162,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $156,670 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $110,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $83,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $58,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $52,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $37,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $33,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $26,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $25,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $24,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $20,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetASHOKA: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $18,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetB'TSELEM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetID INSIGHT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARKET SQUARE CONCERTS: $9,900 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE: $8,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget350ORG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS UNITED: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF GREATER HARRISBURG INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEQUIP FOR EQUALITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $1,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $1,840 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION: $1,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHOKA ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds B'TSELEM INC ↗
  • Who funds ID INSIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARKET SQUARE CONCERTS ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIA'S FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Capital RegionPA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Capital Region · The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Joseph T and Helen M Simpson Foundation · Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals · Lois Lehrman Grass Foundation · Upmc Pinnacle · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Key Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Key Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Key’s filings →

More from the funding graph