Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kevin & Diane Kesler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$151kPhilanthropy$32kHealth$9kInternational$5kYouth Development$2kHuman Services$2kFood & Nutrition$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$213k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LDS CHURCH$32,882
EXODUS CRY$1,828
YOUTH FUTURES$1,000
YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS$1,000
GOFUNDME$110
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAIR HOPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%EXODUS CRY: $2k → 10%PAYPAL GIVING FUND: $2k → 14%YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS: $1k → 9%TASK FORCE GLOBAL HEALTH: $600 → 14%NATHAN OGDEN: $700 → 8%UTAH FOOD BANK: $618 → 8%YCC: $1k → 9%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $7k → 8%ST ANNES: $1k → 9%OPERATION UNDERGROUND: $1k → 10%LDS CHURCH: $80k → 8%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $7k → 8%YCC: $1k → 9%OPERATION UNDERGROUND: $1k → 10%LDS CHURCH: $33k → 8%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $6k → 8%UTAH FOOD BANK: $1k → 9%OPERATION UNDERGROUND: $1k → 10%LDS CHURCH: $18k → 8%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $5k → 8%YCC: $1k → 9%OPERATION UNDERGROUND: $924 → 10%LDS CHURCH: $9k → 8%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $3k → 8%YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS: $1k → 9%OPERATION UNDERGROUND: $700 → 10%LDS CHURCH: $1k → 8%LDS PHILANTHROPIES: $2k → 8%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 9%LDS CHURCH: $707 → 8%YCC: $1k → 9%RESCUE MISSION OF SLC: $618 → 8%BEST FRIENDS: $1k → 9%EAGLE CONDOR HUMANITARIAN: $1k → 8%TAYLOR FAMILY: $1k → 9%EAGLE CONDOR HUMANITARIAN: $1k → 8%BEST FRIENDS: $1k → 9%EAGLE CONDOR HUMANITARIAN: $900 → 8%EAGLE CONDOR HUMANITARIAN: $840 → 8%YOUTH FUTURES: $1k → 9%EAGLE CONDOR HUMANITARIAN: $720 → 8%YOUTH FUTURES: $1k → 9%YOUTH FUTURES: $1k → 9%YOUTH FUTURES: $1k → 9%YOUTH FUTURES: $1k → 9%YOUTH FUTURES: $1k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $700 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$211k · 16 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
17

Total granted

$211k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+3%

Still filing today

38%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthCivil RightsReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YF
    YOUTH FUTURES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +65%
  • EC
    EXODUS CRY INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +14%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • TF
    TAYLOR FAMILY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CH
    CHAIR HOPE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
2
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
3
National Taxpayers Union Foundation

National taxpayers union foundation (ntuf) provides crucial, impactful research and analysis showing americans how taxes, government spending, and regulations affect them. with our unique combination of policy expertise, outreach know-how,…

—
4
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
5
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
6
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology Inc

Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.

Science & Tech
8
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
9
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
10
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
11
IDENTITY2020 Systems Inc

Id2020 brings together diverse voices to set technical requirements, influence policy, and accelerate the implementation of digital id programs that benefit the most vulnerable.

—
12
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leading Saints. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LDS CHURCH: $141,945 · OtherLDS CHURCHLDS PHILANTHROPIES: $30,360 · OtherLDS PHILANTHROPIES+26 more: $39,073 · Other+26 moreYOUTH FUTURES: $7,705 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthEXODUS CRY INC: $2,569 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,300 · InternationalPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $1,500 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $110 · PhilanthropyLeading Saints: $551 · ReligionALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $153 · Civil Rights
Other$211,378Health$7,905International$3,869Philanthropy$1,610Religion$551Civil Rights$153

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH FUTURES: $7,705 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEXODUS CRY INC: $2,569 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,721 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $706 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeading Saints: $551 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $153 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJustice Defense Fund: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds EXODUS CRY INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Leading Saints ↗
  • Who funds THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF THE WEST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 590 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kevin & Diane Kesler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kevin & Diane Kesler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kevin & Diane Kesler Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kevin & Diane Kesler Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kevin & Diane Kesler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph