Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ketchum Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$420k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.3MHealth$2.1MHuman Services$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.7MFood & Nutrition$1.1MHousing & Shelter$1.0MRecreation & Sports$677kEnvironment$360kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $560k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $800k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$54M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSU FOUNDATION$420,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$250,000
INFANT CRISIS SERVICES$250,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$200,000
UNITED WAY HOUSTON$130,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$100,000
FRIENDS OF LOVERS KEY$100,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY$70,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHELSEA$50,000
12TH MAN FOUNDATION$50,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$40,000
CLAREHOUSE$40,000
HOPE IS ALIVE$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $70k → 9%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $25k → 14%FOSTERING HOPE: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $60k → 9%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $45k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $10k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $19k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $45k → 9%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 14%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $250k → 16%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 14%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $70k → 16%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $10k → 14%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $30k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $25k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $25k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $25k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $25k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $25k → 16%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $35k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $35k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $27k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $25k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $40k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $40k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $40k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $40k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $40k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $35k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $25k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
MO
VA
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 61 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
9

Total granted

$15M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+49%

Still filing today

57%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +46%
  • United Way of Greater Houston
    6× · 2019–2024 · $820k · revenue +11%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $800k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CP
    COMMUINITY PARNTERS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • GB
    GREEN BERET FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +54%
  • GA
    GRAND ADDICTION RECOVERY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
3
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
4
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
5
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
6
Texas Children's Health Plan

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
7
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
8
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
9
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
10
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
11
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
12
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Beret Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Lovers Key Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,695,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $715,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYOKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $615,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITALUNITED WAY: $465,000 · OtherUNITED WAYTHE UNITED WAY INC: $300,000 · OtherCOMM FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OK: $300,000 · OtherNEO DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $285,400 · OtherALZHIEMER'S ASSOCIATION - ST LOUIS: $280,000 · OtherTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $300,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF LOVERS KEY INC: $300,000 · Other+35 more: $2,029,200 · Other+35 moreOklahoma State University Foundation: $2,960,040 · EducationOklahoma State University …Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $412,000 · EducationTexas A&M University 12th …+4 more: $190,000 · Education+4 moreINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $475,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRI…Clarehouse Inc: $285,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse…Community Partners of Montgomery County: $220,000 · Human ServicesCommunity …TULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $122,000 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS…Emergency Infant Services Inc: $119,100 · Human ServicesEmergency …FORT MYERS BEACH WOMENS CLUB INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesFORT MYERS BEACH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Human Services+6 more: $80,000 · Human Services+6 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $800,000 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $105,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $100,000 · HealthCook Children's Medical Center: $58,000 · Health+2 more: $57,000 · HealthUnited Way of Greater Houston: $820,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $800,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHELSEA INC: $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHALLENGE SOCCER CLUB: $70,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$7,284,600Education$3,562,040Human Services$1,421,100Health$1,120,000Philanthropy$825,000Food & Nutrition$800,000Youth Development$350,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $2,960,040 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $820,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $800,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $800,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $475,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $412,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $300,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF LOVERS KEY INC: $300,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $285,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHELSEA INC: $260,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetCommunity Partners of Montgomery County: $220,000 over 4y, 79% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNAMI OF TULSA INC: $170,000 over 4y, 55% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $155,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $122,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $119,100 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGE SOCCER CLUB: $70,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $68,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $62,100 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFORT MYERS BEACH WOMENS CLUB INC: $60,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetFORT MYERS BEACH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCook Children's Medical Center: $58,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $58,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF FORT WORTH INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $35,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBORRACHO PESCADOR: $32,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFORT MYERS BEACH ART ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetYOUTH DEVELOPMENT OF TULSA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYouth for Change: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Bucky Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LOVERS KEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHELSEA INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Partners of Montgomery County ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE SOCCER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FORT MYERS BEACH WOMENS CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK23× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The David E & Cassie L Temple Foundation · The Charles & Peggy Stephenson Family Foundation · The Oxley Foundation · Stuart Family Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Gelvin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ketchum Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ketchum Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ketchum’s filings →

More from the funding graph