Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kerith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MReligion$818kHousing & Shelter$90kHealth$80kFood & Nutrition$58kArts & Culture$54kCommunity Improvement$46kHuman Services$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $250k
$3,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILMINTON COMMUNITY EVENGELICAL CHURCH(WCEC)$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASS$50,000
ISLAND CHURCH$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - TAMPA BAY$25,000
AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST$25,000
ECM (EUROPE CAMPUS MINISTRY)$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS$3,500
CHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIES$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
MX SERVELEAD INTERNATIONAL$3,000
MEALS ON WHEELS DELAWARE$3,000
FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
DE
NM
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 37 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
23

Total granted

$2.3M
$305k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+46%

Still filing today

46%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionFood & NutritionHealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $671k · revenue +37%
  • OF
    OSA Foundation Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $70k · revenue +92%
  • SB
    Sunday Breakfast Mission
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +4%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASS LOWELL
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
4
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
5
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
6
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
7
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
8
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
9
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
10
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
11
Faith Baptist Bible College

Post secondary and graduate educational institution The mission of Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary is to equip vocational Christian workers and other servant leaders while inspiring them to take the Word to the world.

Education
12
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overseas Campus Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Drexel University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $671,150 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREWILMINTON COMMUNITY EVENGELICAL CHURCH(WCEC): $438,378 · OtherWILMINTON COMMUNITY EVENGELICAL CHURCH(WCEC)UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $225,520 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHUNIVERSITY OF MASS: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST: $197,000 · OtherAMBASSADORS FOR CHRISTIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+43 more: $566,360 · Other+43 moreOSA Foundation Inc: $70,000 · PhilanthropyEUROPE CAMPUS MINISTRY: $23,000 · ReligionMX SERVELEAD INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $8,000 · ReligionTOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE: $7,000 · ReligionDeveloping Leaders Ministries: $6,000 · ReligionOVERSEAS CAMPUS MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 · Religion+2 more: $3,000 · ReligionFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $36,500 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels Delaware Inc: $21,000 · Food & NutritionDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $18,000 · InternationalHARVEST USA: $8,300 · HealthFRIENDS OF GRACE: $3,000 · Health
Other$2,398,408Philanthropy$70,000Religion$63,000Food & Nutrition$57,500Education$54,000International$18,000Health$11,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $671,150 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOSA Foundation Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSunday Breakfast Mission: $39,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $36,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEUROPE CAMPUS MINISTRY: $23,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC: $22,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels Delaware Inc: $21,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE GOSPEL MISSION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMX SERVELEAD INTERNATIONAL: $12,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST USA: $8,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE: $7,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDeveloping Leaders Ministries: $6,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetOVERSEAS CAMPUS MINISTRIES INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF GRACE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDelaware Technology Park Inc: $2,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY KEEPERS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA BAY WATCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds OSA Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Sunday Breakfast Mission ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds EUROPE CAMPUS MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds CHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels Delaware Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MX SERVELEAD INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENCE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST USA ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE ↗
  • Who funds Developing Leaders Ministries ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hsieh Christian FoundationWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hsieh Christian Foundation · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kerith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kerith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Delaware Technology Park Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Center for Creative Arts Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Independence School Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kerith Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kerith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kerith’s filings →

More from the funding graph