Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kent Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$141kHealth$46kEducation$23kReligion$21kYouth Development$15kCrime & Legal$2kRecreation & Sports$2kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$56k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLAY FOR PINK$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LUEKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $1k → 9%TUNNEL TO TOWERS: $5k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 17%OPERATION AIRDROP: $1k → 8%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $2k → 14%SW FLORIDA CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC: $72k → 11%CIMEK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%HEART TO HEART MISSION: $5k → 5%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2k → 21%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $3k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 17%SW FLORIDA CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC: $38k → 11%CLC: $3k → 11%HEART TO HEART MISSION: $5k → 5%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 17%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $2k → 11%HEART TO HEART MISSION: $5k → 5%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $2k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 17%HEART TO HEART MISSION: $5k → 11%CHILDRENS ASSESSMENT CENT: $1k → 11%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 17%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 11%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 17%PLAY FOR PINK: $5k → 11%SWFL CHILREN'S CHARITIES: $31k → 11%COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINIC: $1k → 11%FIRST ASSEMBLY MINISTRIES: $500 → 11%BISHOP VEROT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $250 → 11%ST MICHAELS LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $4k → 11%ST MICHAEL LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $3k → 11%ST MICHAELS LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MD
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$228k · 7 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +106% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$228k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+4%

Still filing today

57%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationRecreation & SportsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST
    3× · 2018–2024 · $141k · revenue +10%
  • PF
    PLAY FOR PINK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +106%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +43%
  • LM
    LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SM
    ST MICHAEL LUTHERAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
7
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
8
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
11
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST — $140,500 · PhilanthropySWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FE…HEART TO HEART MISSION — $20,000 · OtherHEART TO HEART MISSIONPLAY FOR PINK — $15,000 · OtherPLAY FOR PINKLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · OtherLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYST…ST MICHAELS LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $4,500 · OtherST MICHAELS LUTHERAN SCH…ST MICHAEL LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $2,500 · OtherCLC — $2,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $2,000 · Other+6 more — $4,750 · Other+6 morePLAY FOR PINK INC — $30,000 · Crime & LegalPLAY FOR PINK…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $13,500 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,155 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $4,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,500 · Religion
Philanthropy$140,500Other$55,750Crime & Legal$30,000Education$13,500Health$10,155Recreation & Sports$2,000Religion$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST — $140,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,155 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION AIRDROP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SWFL CHILDREN'S CHARITIES INC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WINE & FOOD FEST
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds OPERATION AIRDROP INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kent Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph