Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenny Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$961k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.8MReligion$1.2MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$994kPublic Safety & Disaster$125kPhilanthropy$100kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $425k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Challenge Foundation$300,000
Sidewalk Advocates for Life$100,000
Arrupe Jesuit High School$100,000
Archdiocese of Denver$100,000
Fire Foundation$75,000
Escuela de Guadalupe$50,000
Hope House of Colorado$35,000
Assumption Catholic School$25,000
Blessed Miguel Pro Catholic Academy$25,000
St Therese Catholic Classical School$25,000
St Rose of Lima School$25,000
Nativity of Our Lord$25,000
Annunciation Catholic School$25,000
Guardian Angels Catholic School$25,000
St Vincent de Paul Poor Box$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $284k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Fish Inc of Sanibel: $50k → 11%Hope House of Colorado: $78k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $35k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $25k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $20k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $20k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $20k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $18k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $15k → 7%Catholic Charities of Denver: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
TN
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 24 repeat orgs$998k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
23

Total granted

$6.6M
$920k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+26%

Still filing today

25%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $885k · revenue +216%
  • SA
    Sidewalk Advocates for Life
    3× · 2022–2024 · $263k · revenue +10%
  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $231k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • SO
    SEEDS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • TC
    The Catholic Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF OWENSBORO
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
2
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
3
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
4
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
5
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
6
Arapahoe County Early Childhood Council Inc

Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
9
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
12
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities & Community Serv of the Archdiocese of Denver; the most unlike its peers is Mapleton Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY FAMILY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $1,040,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY HIGH SCHOOL INCNATIVITY OF OUR LORD CATHOLIC PARISH IN BROOMFIELD: $653,346 · OtherNATIVITY OF OUR LORD CATHOLIC PARISH IN BROOMFIELDESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $420,000 · OtherESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $300,000 · OtherARRUPE JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLCatholic Charities: $265,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $252,000 · OtherSEEDS OF HOPE: $250,000 · OtherSt Catherine's of Sienna School: $200,000 · Other+30 more: $1,591,800 · Other+30 moreTHE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,115,000 · EducationTHE CHALLENGE FOU…+3 more: $42,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD INC: $884,613 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF BR…HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $231,034 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $50,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesSidewalk Advocates for Life: $263,000 · HealthDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $15,000 · HealthCOLORADO VINCENTIAN VOLUNTEERS: $25,000 · Religion
Other$4,972,146Education$1,157,500Recreation & Sports$884,613Human Services$284,034Health$278,000Religion$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,115,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetFRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD INC: $884,613 over 7y, 13% of budgetSidewalk Advocates for Life: $263,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $231,034 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOLORADO VINCENTIAN VOLUNTEERS: $25,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBal Swan Childrens Center: $13,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMapleton Education Foundation: $12,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHALLENGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds Sidewalk Advocates for Life ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO VINCENTIAN VOLUNTEERS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds DOMINICAN HOME HEALTH AGENCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Catholic Foundation No Colorado · Seeds of Hope of Northern Colorado Inc · Daniels Fund · Rose Community Foundation · John & Florence Fortune Foundation · Pema Foundation Inc · The Martin Family Foundation · Jk Mullen Foundation · Frie Family Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenny Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenny Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kenny Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kenny Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenny’s filings →

    More from the funding graph