Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth P Gifford Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$81kHuman Services$27kPhilanthropy$25kHealth$19kCommunity Improvement$14kCivil Rights$10kReligion$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$826k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POSITIVE DIRECTIONS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
YMCA$1,371
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%PROJECT AMISTAD: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 10 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +150% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$157k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+150%
+8%

Still filing today

20%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2019–2025 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k
  • Y
    YMCA
    2× · 2019–2025 · $21k

Funded once

  • SU
    Schreiner Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +36%
  • EP
    EL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue +83%
  • EP
    EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicanos Por La Causa Inc Cplc

We drive economic and political empowerment.

Human Services
2
North Central Texas Community Health Care Center

To provide access to quality, affordable, primary care and preventative services by reaching out to everyone, including the underserved. program services are delivered through ten clinical sites located throughout wichita falls, vernon,…

Health
3
Palo Alto University Inc

Advancing human understanding through education, research, and practice in behavioral science

Education
4
Salud Para La Gente

To provide high quality, comprehensive, and cost effective healthcare responsive to the needs of the communities we serve.

—
5
Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara County

The mission of family service agency is to strengthen and advocate for families and individuals of all ages and diversities, helping to create and preserve a healthy community.

Human Services
6
Presbyterian Healthcare Services

Presbyterian exists to ensure all of the patients, members and communities we serve can achieve their best health.

Health
7
Council On Regional Economic Exp & Educational Development Foundation

Lead efforts to identify and support initiatives that improve college readiness and ensure more students graduate with a college degree or certification. partner with education leaders, funders, and regional, state, and national…

Education
8
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
9
Pajaro Valley Community Health Trust

The health trust aims to improve health and quality of life for residents of the greater pajaro valley by providing health promotion services and diabetes self-management education. additionally, we convene cross-sector stakeholders to…

Health
10
Memorial Hermann Community Benefit Corporation

To implement solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community. we collaborate with others as well as create signature, evidence-based ways to improve the communities where people live, work, learn…

Social Science
11
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
12
Ella Austin Community Center

To empower individuals and families across the life span by providing multiple, integrated services that meet the needs of san antonio's neighborhood and beyond.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Diabetes Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $30,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO: $29,594 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASOYMCA: $21,371 · OtherYMCATHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO: $15,950 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASOCENTER FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT: $13,840 · OtherCENTER FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENTEL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $12,614 · OtherEL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF EL PAS: $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF EL PASIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+7 more: $15,198 · Other+7 morePaso del Norte Community Foundation: $25,000 · HealthPaso del Norte …EL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $4,000 · HealthEL PASO CHILDRE…+1 more: $500 · HealthCENTER FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS: $16,875 · EducationCENTER FOR …Schreiner University: $5,000 · EducationSchreiner U…EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $3,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT AMISTAD INC: $1,500 · Human Services
Other$160,817Health$29,500Education$21,875Food & Nutrition$3,000Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS: $16,875 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSchreiner University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER: $3,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT AMISTAD INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT SYSTEMS ↗
  • Who funds Schreiner University ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO GUIDANCE CENTER INC dba EL PASO CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT AMISTAD INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO DIABETES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hunt Family FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hunt Family Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth P Gifford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth P Gifford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kenneth P Gifford Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kenneth P Gifford Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenneth P Gifford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph