Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kenneth Goodman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.2MHealth$765kHuman Services$6kReligion$3kPhilanthropy$3kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$800Public Safety & Disaster$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$193,189
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$193,189
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COPE FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 7%COPE FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 13 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$2.0M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+13%

Still filing today

85%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +45%
  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $748k · revenue +52%
  • NW
    NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JED FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +429%
  • BT
    BET TORAH
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • TC
    The Children's Health Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
3
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
4
The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research

The feinstein institute for medical research ("the institute") is the research branch of northwell health ("northwell"). through its affiliation with northwell, the institute's mission is to bridge the gap between biomedical research and…

Health
5
Fcancer

FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.

Health
6
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

7
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
8
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
9
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

10
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
11
Children's Hospital Pathology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide pathology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
12
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $1,204,189 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY+2 more — $1,000 · EducationISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $747,864 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $29,200 · Other+8 more — $7,700 · OtherLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $3,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEARING INC — $500 · HealthKATONAH-BEDFORD HILLS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP — $500 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $6,250 · PhilanthropyCOPE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $2,000 · Food & NutritionJewish Community Relations Council of New York — $500 · Civil RightsBEDFORD HILLS FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $350 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$1,205,189Other$784,764Health$8,750Philanthropy$6,250Human Services$6,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Civil Rights$500Public Safety & Disaster$350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $1,204,189 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $747,864 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $6,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOPE FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS BRITTLE BONE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWESTCHESTER GOLF ASSOCIATION CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Community Relations Council of New York — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKATONAH-BEDFORD HILLS VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP — $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE TOWN OF BEDFORD INC — $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CARING CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kenneth Goodman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph