Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenneth Cook Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$451kEducation$101kHealth$31k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
$1,219
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC$28,947
THE SALVATION ARMY$28,947
JOHNSON COUNTRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,219
LABETTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,219
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$1,219
PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY$1,219
BENEDICTINE COLLEGE$1,219
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,219
DRURY UNIVERSITY$1,219
WHITE LINE CDL TRAINING$914
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY$914
HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$611
BAKER UNIVERSITY$611
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $213k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $54k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $29k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $29k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $27k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $27k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $23k → 14%MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
PA
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
KS
AR
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$556k · 17 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
19

Total granted

$556k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+21%

Still filing today

24%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $213k · revenue +166%
  • GC
    GENEVA COLLEGE
    3× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +17%
  • BC
    Benedictine College
    2× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • KS
    KENTUCKY STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ST MARY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • JC
    JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
2
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
3
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
4
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
9
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
12
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evangel University; the most unlike its peers is Benedictine College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $158,387 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSALVATION ARMY: $80,172 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMIDLAND HOSPICE CARE: $30,747 · OtherMIDLAND HOSPICE CAREUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $20,613 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KANSASKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $13,015 · Other+25 more: $54,963 · Other+25 moreMIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $212,844 · Human ServicesMIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INCGENEVA COLLEGE: $2,609 · EducationBenedictine College: $2,493 · EducationBAKER UNIVERSITY: $2,130 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $1,219 · EducationDrury University: $1,219 · EducationEvangel University: $1,008 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC: $575 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $547 · EducationTabor College: $510 · Education
Other$357,897Human Services$212,844Education$12,310

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC: $212,844 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGENEVA COLLEGE: $2,609 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBenedictine College: $2,493 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAKER UNIVERSITY: $2,130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $1,219 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDrury University: $1,219 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEvangel University: $1,008 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC: $575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $547 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTabor College: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDLAND CARE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds BAKER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Drury University ↗
  • Who funds Evangel University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds Tabor College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Je and le Mabee Foundation IncTX15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Margaret Nelson Castle College Scholarship Trust · Jellison Benevolent Society Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenneth Cook Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenneth Cook Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenneth Cook’s filings →

    More from the funding graph