How much did KENNETH AND CAROLINE TAYLOR grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of KENNETH AND CAROLINE TAYLOR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

food pantryeducation

2019

educationscholarshipssimsbury volunteer

2020

outreachgolfscholarshipssimsbury volunteer

2021

opperationalrescuesnake rivergolfscholarshipssimsbury volunteer

2022

artsopperationalgolfsnake riversimsbury volunteerscholarships

2023

opperationaloutreachsnake riverscholarshipssimsbury volunteer

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k32 grants · $99k
$10k–50k21 grants · $292k
$50k–250k4 grants · $292k
$250k+2 grants · $775k

$6,000

Median grant

States reached

$12M

Total assets

Largest grants

WYALUSING VALLEY VOLUNTEER FIRE CO$500,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART$275,250
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA - SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$117,500
WYALUSING AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$63,250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$60,787
JACKSON HOLE HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND MUSEUM$50,000
PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE$25,000
JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST$25,000
WYALUSING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$20,084
BLAIR ACADEMY OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT$20,000
KINGSWOOD OXFORD$20,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$15,000
GUTHRIE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM$15,000
CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY$15,000
GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.3M · 70 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

70 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.3M

$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%

+13%

Still filing today

57%

41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JH
JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST
8× · 2017–2024 · $347k · revenue +146%
CF
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE
8× · 2017–2024 · $257k · revenue +170%
PO
PROTECT OUR WATER JACKSON HOLE
7× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +483%

Funded once

UW
UNITED WAY OF BRADFORD COUNTY
one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +13%
WC
WYOMING COUNTY CULTURAL CENTER INC
one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -17%
TT
THE TVRC EDUCATION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Trout Unlimited Jackson Hole 051

Jhtu was formed in 1983 in jackson, wyoming, to conserve, protect, and restore jackson hole's coldwater fisheries and their watersheds. currently jhtu has a membershp of 410 jackson hole residents and others concerned about the precious…

Animals

Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations

Environment

Rendezvous Lands Conservancy

To improve the quality of life in rural intermountain west communities by protecting, owning, and creating locally significant keystone conservation properties as public access parks.

Environment

The Wyldlife Fund

Uniting people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and educaton.

Animals

Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals

Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals

Wyoming Natural Resource Foundation

Promote, maintain, and assist informational educational and research projects related to natural resource conservation

Environment

Teton Regional Land Trust Inc

Trlt works to conserve eastern idaho's important agricultural lands and fish and wildlife habitat.

Environment

Eastern Wyoming Nature Center

To discover, preserve and celebrate the natural resources of eastern wyoming.

Arts & Culture

Five Valleys Land Trust

To protect for future generations western montana's natural legacy, our river corridors, wildlife habitat, agricultural lands, and community open spaces. the five valleys we serve are the bitterroot, the blackfoot, the upper clark fork,…

Environment

Willistown Conservation Trust Inc

The mission of the Willistown Conservation Trust is to preserve and manage the open land, rural character, scenic, recreational, historic, agricultural and natural resources of the Willistown area and nearby communities, and to share these…

Environment

Wyoming Assoc of Conservation

The wyoming association of conservation districts provides leadership for the conservation of wyoming's soil and water resources through a responsible conservation ethic.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jackson Hole Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is Wilkes University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/53

the rest of the field

576/7,412

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

51 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

50/51

Grantees still filing

37/51

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,994,514Arts & Culture$901,589Environment$661,500Philanthropy$368,487Education$227,000Human Services$140,000Health$97,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY36.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Tuscarora Wayne Mutual Foundation · United Way of Bradford County · Sordoni Family Foundation · The Free Lunch Foundation · Robert S & Grayce B Kerr Foundation · The Brooks Foundation · Allone Foundation · The Wilson Family Foundation · Lightner Sams Foundation of Wyoming · Tioga Downs Regional Community · Allone Charities

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation KENNETH AND CAROLINE TAYLOR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WYALUSING VALLEY MUSEUM ASSN INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~23 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232178428 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WYALUSING VALLEY MUSEUM ASSN INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 23 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 67% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Kenneth and Caroline Taylor?

Find your warmest path to Kenneth and Caroline Taylor through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

KENNETH AND CAROLINE TAYLOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

51 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kenneth and Caroline Taylor?

More from the funding graph

KENNETH AND CAROLINE TAYLOR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

51 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kenneth and Caroline Taylor?

More from the funding graph