Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kenmore Rotary Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$43kYouth Development$37kRecreation & Sports$31kArts & Culture$23kHousing & Shelter$23kPublic Benefit$22kFood & Nutrition$18kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$530k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENMORE MERCY FOUNDATION$10,000
GREATER FALLS COUNCIL BSA$9,150
KENMORE ROTARY CHARITIES INC$9,000
ELMLAWN MEMORIAL PARK FOUNDATION$6,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Hope Project of WNY Inc: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Kenmore Rotary Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 81%.

Kenmore Rotary Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 10 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
34

Total granted

$131k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+82%

Still filing today

40%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    KENMORE ROTARY CHARITIES INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +411%
  • BS
    BUFFALO SOCIETY OF NATURAL SCIENCES
    2× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +54%
  • CRADLE BEACH INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • KM
    KEN-TON MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • HF
    HEARTS FOR THE HOMELESS OF WNY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -5%
  • GN
    GREAT NIAGARA FRONTIER COUNCIL BSA
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Genesee Land Trust Inc

Genesee Land Trust preserves and protects natural lands and waterways that enhance the quality of life in the Greater Rochester region - providing wildlife habitat, locally grown food, and connections to nature.

Environment
2
Thompson Park Conservancy Inc

Zoo new york, by example and action, provides knowledge and motivation for conserving nature in new york state through science-based natural and cultural experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
Lockport Cares Inc

The organization provides charitable relief in the form of emergency shelter, material needs, and compassionate care for the homeless and persons in need in the eastern niagara county, new york area.

Education
4
Endeavor Western New York Inc

Endeavor western new york identifies and selects high-impact entrepreneurs in and around buffalo and rochester, ny and provides them access to a global network of markets, industry leaders, investors, and talent, helping to expand their…

Education
5
Rochester General Health System

Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health
6
Seneca Park Zoo Society

Chartered as an educational institution by new york state in 1957, the society provides education and programming & conservation, fundraising, special events, public relations and marketing, and membership to monroe county's seneca park…

Animals
7
Earth Day New York Inc

Promotion of environmental protection

Environment
8
Gardiner Library Board of Trustees

The Gardiner Library Board of Trustees operates the public library that serves the Town of Gardiner and the surrounding areas of New York State.

Education
9
New York Restoration Project

New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…

Environment
10
Buffalo Niagara River Land Trust Inc

To acquire, remediate, and steward lands along wny's waterfronts prioritizing public access.

Environment
11
Veterans One-Stop Center of Wny Inc

We. empower. veterans. the veterans one-stop center of wny, inc. is the region's premiere veterans service and advocacy not-for-profit collaborative agency empowering veterans, veteran families and service members in achieving economic…

Public Benefit
12
Adirondack Mountain Club Inc

Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kenmore Mercy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Girls Education Collaborative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY CLUB OF KENMORE: $21,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF KENMOREELMLAWN MEMORIAL PARK FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 · OtherELMLAWN MEMORIAL PARK FOUNDATION INCKEN-TON MEALS ON WHEELS: $12,000 · OtherKEN-TON MEALS ON WHEELSGNFC Boy Scouts of America: $10,100 · OtherGNFC Boy Scouts of AmericaGREATER FALLS COUNCIL BSA: $9,150 · OtherGREAT NIAGARA FRONTIER COUNCIL BSA: $8,000 · OtherKenton Chamber of Commerce: $7,500 · Other+33 more: $96,018 · Other+33 moreKENMORE MERCY FOUNDATION: $31,500 · HealthKENMORE MERCY…KENMORE ROTARY CHARITIES INC: $14,200 · PhilanthropyBUFFALO SOCIETY OF NATURAL SCIENCES: $13,500 · Arts & CultureHEARTS FOR THE HOMELESS OF WNY INC: $10,674 · ReligionCRADLE BEACH INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $8,000 · Education
Other$180,768Health$31,500Philanthropy$14,200Arts & Culture$13,500Religion$10,674Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENMORE MERCY FOUNDATION: $31,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetKENMORE ROTARY CHARITIES INC: $14,200 over 3y, 14% of budgetBUFFALO SOCIETY OF NATURAL SCIENCES: $13,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTS FOR THE HOMELESS OF WNY INC: $10,674 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCRADLE BEACH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SUMMIT CENTER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKenmore Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAMES V AND FAY P RYAN PARAMEDIC FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENMORE MERCY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KENMORE ROTARY CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO SOCIETY OF NATURAL SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS FOR THE HOMELESS OF WNY INC ↗
  • Who funds CRADLE BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Kenmore Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOME BENEATH OUR FEET INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PROJECT OF WNY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds JAMES V AND FAY P RYAN PARAMEDIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · The John R Oishei Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kenmore Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kenmore Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kenmore Rotary Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kenmore Rotary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kenmore Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph