Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kelley Family Christian Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$185kEducation$48kInternational$29kEmployment$25kArts & Culture$10kHealth$10kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$5k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lipscomb Univ$30,000
Christian Family Svc$15,000
Hillside Hope Inc$5,000
Family Life Missions$2,500
Hillside Hope Inc$800
Shults-Lewis Child & Family Services$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hillside Hope Inc: $5k → 5%Hillside Hope Inc: $1k → 5%Hillside Hope Inc: $800 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IN
AR
TN
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Kelley Family Christian Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 15% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 5%.

Kelley Family Christian Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 27% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 7 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$210k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+32%

Still filing today

71%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalHuman ServicesEmploymentReligionEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    Family Life Missions Inc
    5× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +15%
  • HW
    HOPE WORKS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +97%
  • FH
    FAMILY HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $23k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • RH
    RIGHT HAND MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -43%
  • GK
    GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • GC
    Gospel Chariot Mission
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope International Ministries Inc

To rescue the next generation. This organization provides a stable and loving christian home for displaced children. The care of these children includes food, shelter, education and faith based activities.

Human Services
2
His House Inc

His house children's home is a faith-based organization that restores the lives of children and families.

—
3
Hope Homes International

Hope Homes International is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes to serve poor, distressed, and underprivileged populations in the United States and abroad by providing affordable, scholarship-based childcare and…

Human Services
4
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
5
Hope Ministries International

To promote gods glory through missions.

Human Services
6
Living Hope International Inc

Living hope international (lhi) is a faith-based organization with a three-fold mission. our goals are to: provide for underprivileged children and families by establishing orphanages, schools, and outreach programs throughout the world.…

Housing & Shelter
7
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
8
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
9
Hope Homes International Inc

Provides children in kenya that have been literally thrown away by their parents a new loving home-(not orphanage or boarding house) with a mother, father and siblings. they are also put into the top school in the city and given a first…

Recreation & Sports
10
Hope of Honduras Inc

Organization operates a children's home in Honduras that provides food, clothing, shelter, medical care and education to abused and abandonded children in need.

International
11
His Hope Ministries Inc

Helping families fight homelessness and find living hope.

Housing & Shelter
12
Full Gospel Church in India & Shepherd Children's Home

Providing educational and religious support to orphanage children

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Heritage Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lipscomb University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Riverchase Church of Christ: $35,000 · OtherRiverchase Church of ChristLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITYHIGHLAND STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST OF MEMPHIS: $30,000 · OtherHIGHLAND STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST OF MEMPHISChristian Family Svc: $15,000 · OtherChristian Family SvcGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $10,000 · OtherGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INCGospel Chariot Mission: $10,000 · OtherGospel Chariot MissionFamily Heritage FoundationInc: $10,000 · OtherFamily Heritage FoundationIncHomewood Church of Christ: $10,000 · OtherHomewood Church of Christ+2 more: $7,500 · OtherFamily Life Missions Inc: $70,000 · InternationalFamily Life Missions IncJUSTICE AND MERCY INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · InternationalJUSTICE AND MERCY INTERNATIONALHOPE WORKS INC: $25,000 · EmploymentFAMILY HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $23,035 · EducationRIGHT HAND MINISTRIES: $10,000 · ReligionHOUSING FORWARD: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHILLSIDE HOPE INC: $6,800 · Human ServicesSHULTS-LEWIS CHILD & FAMILY SVCS I: $300 · Human Services
Other$157,500International$90,000Employment$25,000Education$23,035Religion$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Human Services$7,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFamily Life Missions Inc: $70,000 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE WORKS INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $23,035 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetJUSTICE AND MERCY INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING FORWARD: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSIDE HOPE INC: $6,800 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetSHULTS-LEWIS CHILD & FAMILY SVCS I: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Family Life Missions Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE AND MERCY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT HAND MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHULTS-LEWIS CHILD & FAMILY SVCS I ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kelley Family Christian Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kelley Family Christian Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kelley Family Christian Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kelley Family Christian Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kelley Family Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph