Skip to content
Kdt Outreach Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kdt Outreach Inc

The organization supports jewish educational institutions and general educational programming; supports and assists in funding synagogues, publishing and distribtion of judaic materials.

$141k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$547kHuman Services$43kInternational$20k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $132,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $140,506 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,006 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
$112,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEMILAS CHESED CHASDEI YITZCHOK$112,500
AMERICAN FRIEDNDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $15k → 11%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY: $28k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEMILAS CHESED CHASDEI YITZCHOK: $313,535 · OtherGEMILAS CHESED CHASDEI YITZCHOKSAR SHALOM INC: $80,000 · OtherSAR SHALOM INCCONGREGATION BAIS SHALOM INC: $72,800 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS SHALOM INCAHAVAS CHESED INC: $38,000 · OtherAHAVAS CHESED INC+2 more: $15,000 · OtherAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $27,720 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $15,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $20,000 · InternationalLIMUDEI DA'AS INC: $16,000 · ReligionMEGED SHOMAYIM: $12,000 · Education
Other$519,335Human Services$42,720International$20,000Religion$16,000Education$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $27,720 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIMUDEI DA'AS INC: $16,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEGED SHOMAYIM: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…The Adjmi-Dwek Founda…The Jimmy and Berta K…American Friends of R…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…The Jmg FoundationDonors Fund IncJewish Communal FundZichron Yechiel Meche…Zichron Chaim Charity…National Philanthropi…
The Ojc FundNY19.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · American Friends of Rct Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kdt Outreach Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kdt Outreach Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kdt Outreach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home