Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Kazan McClain Partners' Foundation

To benefit the public through grants to organizations that will help:- support research into the causes of, treatment for, and prevention of occupational and environmental diseases;- increase and improve public awareness about work-place health and safety, and public health;- enhance access to, participation in, and education about the…

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Crime & Legal$3.3MEducation$1.7MHealth$1.6MYouth Development$647kEmployment$624kFood & Nutrition$582kHuman Services$537kCivil Rights$278kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 37 grants below total $1,215,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,552,150 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $336,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $476k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $431k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$24,300
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAY AREA LEGAL AID$250,000
MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE$75,000
EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER$75,000
WORKSAFE$73,500
BERKELEY LAW FOUNDATION$55,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$52,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$50,000
ACCELERATE CHANGE$50,000
UC HASTINGS FOUNDATION$40,000
EAST OAKLAND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER$40,000
MOREHOUSE COLLEGE$40,000
PROJECT WELL$36,300
LEND A HAND FOUNDATION$35,000
CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND$29,000
IMPACT FUND$28,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $333k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE LAST BEST RIDE (TLBR): $18k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $19k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $18k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $13k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR FREEDOM CENTER: $8k → 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR FREEDOM CENTER: $8k → 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR FREEDOM CENTER: $8k → 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR FREEDOM CENTER: $8k → 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR FREEDOM CENTER: $8k → 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR FREEDOM CENTER: $8k → 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR FREEDOM CENTER: $8k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $40k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $26k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $11k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.5M · 50 repeat orgs$595k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
26

Total granted

$9.5M
$454k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+3%

Still filing today

90%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BAY AREA LEGAL AID
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +96%
  • WI
    Worksafe Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $617k · revenue +183%
  • EB
    EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $597k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • SC
    SHILOH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • GH
    GLOBAL HEALTH THROUGH EDUCATION TRAINING AND SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $34k · revenue -98%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
2
Immigration Institute of the Bay Area

The immigration institute of the bay area helps immigrants, refugees, and their families join and contribute to the community.

Arts & Culture
3
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Uc Berkeley Center for Executive Education

UC Berkeley Center for Executive Education ("CEE") is a nonprofit public benefit corporation dedicated to promoting and advancing education through its executive education programs for corporate and institutional clients seeking continuing…

Education
6
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
7
Legal Aid Association of California

The Legal Aid Association of California, the statewide membership of legal services nonprofits, serves its members through advocacy and other support in efforts to provide legal assistance to low-income Californians and ensure access to…

—
8
Center for Gender and Refugee Studies- California Inc

mental rights of refugee women, children, and LGBT individuals fleeing persecution in their home countries by improving the quality of legal representation available to them and the policies and laws that apply to their protection here in…

Civil Rights
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
11
The Justice and Diversity Center of the Bar Association of San Francisco

The justice & diversity center (jdc) advances fairness and equality by providing pro bono legal services to low-income people and educational opportunities that foster diversity in the legal profession.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Independent Berkeley Student Publishing Company Inc

The Independent Berkeley Student Publishing Co., Inc. (The Daily Californian) is an independent newspaper that trains UC Berkeley students for careers in journalism and business. The paper and its digital products are the primary source…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pacific Bridge Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Developmental Disabilities …Policy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Women & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportYouth Development Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%31%35–55yr13%34%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/85
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,893

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/70
Grantees still filing
47/70
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BAY AREA LEGAL AID — $1,625,150 · OtherBAY AREA LEGAL AIDWorksafe Inc — $616,500 · OtherWorksafe IncALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $389,550 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKEast Oakland Youth Development Center — $320,000 · OtherEast Oakland Youth Development CenterThe Impact Fund — $283,500 · OtherThe Impact FundREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $203,700 · Other+42 more — $1,360,489 · Other+42 moreUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,275,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN F…UC LAW SF FOUNDATION — $264,100 · EducationUC LAW SF FOUNDATIONTHE MOSAIC PROJECT — $213,500 · EducationTHE MOSAIC PROJECTUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $164,450 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMO…DREXEL UNIVERSITY — $160,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYOAKLAND PROMISE — $150,000 · EducationOAKLAND PROMISETHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $120,000 · EducationWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $94,800 · Education+9 more — $235,500 · Education+9 moreEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER — $596,600 · Crime & LegalEAST BAY COMMU…MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $353,000 · Crime & LegalMISSISSIPPI CE…CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC — $175,000 · Crime & LegalCALIFORNIA RUR…CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $82,500 · Crime & LegalCENTRO LEGAL D…BERKELEY LAW FOUNDATION — $80,000 · Crime & LegalBERKELEY LAW F…Asian Law Caucus — $49,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $8,500 · Crime & LegalSEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM — $308,374 · Youth DevelopmentPACIFIC BRIDGE CLUB — $72,100 · Youth DevelopmentCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $224,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOMEN INC-OAKLANDBAY AREA CHAPTER — $98,600 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $52,500 · Food & NutritionLEND A HAND FOUNDATION — $159,275 · Human ServicesCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $103,500 · Human ServicesTHE MARTIN LUTHER KING JRFREEDOM CTR — $52,500 · Human ServicesLast Ride Inc — $17,500 · Human Services+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT WELL — $214,700 · InternationalKIDS CARE EVERYWHERE — $11,300 · International
Other$4,798,889Education$2,777,350Crime & Legal$1,344,600Youth Development$380,474Food & Nutrition$375,100Human Services$342,775International$226,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBAY AREA LEGAL AID — $1,625,150 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,275,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWorksafe Inc — $616,500 over 8y, 11% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER — $596,600 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $389,550 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $353,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetEast Oakland Youth Development Center — $320,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetSEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM — $308,374 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetThe Impact Fund — $283,500 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetUC LAW SF FOUNDATION — $264,100 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $224,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MOSAIC PROJECT — $213,500 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC — $175,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $164,450 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $160,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEND A HAND FOUNDATION — $159,275 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE — $150,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOVNO COMMUNICATIONS INC — $113,600 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $103,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND — $100,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWEST BAY LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $100,000 over 6y, 97% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOMEN INC-OAKLANDBAY AREA CHAPTER — $98,600 over 7y, 24% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $94,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $82,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAssociation of Occupational and Environmental Clinics — $80,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetBERKELEY LAW FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetEQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES — $78,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPACIFIC BRIDGE CLUB — $72,100 over 6y, 27% of budgetLA RAZA CENTRO LEGAL - SAN FRANCISCO — $69,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTHE MARTIN LUTHER KING JRFREEDOM CTR — $52,500 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $52,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCalifornia Rural Legal Assistance Foundation — $50,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAsian Law Caucus — $49,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE — $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $38,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUCSF FOUNDATION INVESTMENT COMPANY — $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH THROUGH EDUCATION TRAINING AND SERVICE INC — $34,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetFAMILY BRIDGES INC — $32,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF THE BAY AREA INC — $30,600 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $28,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKING RIDGE FOUNDATION — $22,500 over 1y, 18% of budgetGOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Worksafe Inc ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds East Oakland Youth Development Center ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN TEPEES YOUTH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds The Impact Fund ↗
  • Who funds UC LAW SF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT WELL ↗
  • Who funds THE MOSAIC PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEND A HAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KOVNO COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds WEST BAY LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COALITION OF 100 BLACK WOMEN INC-OAKLANDBAY AREA CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA ↗
  • Who funds Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY LAW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC BRIDGE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds LA RAZA CENTRO LEGAL - SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds THE MARTIN LUTHER KING JRFREEDOM CTR ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Asian Law Caucus ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco Fou…East Bay Community Fo…The James Irvine Foun…The California Wellne…Jewish Community Fede…Crankstart FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Access to …Stupski FoundationEqual Justice WorksImpactassetsinc
The San Francisco FoundationCA42.6× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Crankstart Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Access to Justice Commission · Stupski Foundation · Equal Justice Works · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kazan McClain Partners' Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kazan McClain Partners' Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kazan McClain Partners' Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines