Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kaufman Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2021
18
Grants FY2021
8
States reached
$5k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Kaufman Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Kaufman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $38k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
15
’18
15
’19
13
’20
12
’21
3
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$424kReligion$421kEducation$267kArts & Culture$119kInternational$106kSocial Science$67kHealth$19kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2021 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS MIDWEST$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$5,000
INTERFAITH YOUTH CORE$5,000
ASPEN INSTITUTE$5,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$3,500
CHICAGO SINAI CONGREGATION$3,150
ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER$3,000
CONGREGATION B'NAI ISRAEL$2,500
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$2,500
CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS$1,000
MUSKEGON MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
UVA LIBRARY$350
LUBAVITCH CHABAD OF NORTHBROOK$252
SPERTUS INSTITUTE$250
JEWISH FEDERATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PATHFINDERS OF MUSKEGON: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CO
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$792k · 26 repeat orgs$234k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2021, 15 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
29

Total granted

$792k
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+38%

Still filing today

50%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationArts & CultureReligionInternationalHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2018–2021 · $70k · revenue +52%
  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $67k · revenue +243%
  • IA
    INTERFAITH AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +395%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +24%
  • GV
    GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO DIV
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
9
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness -Based Education and World Peace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE NA: $300,000 · OtherSHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE NAGVSU KAUFMAN INSTITUTE: $100,000 · OtherGVSU KAUFMAN INSTITUTEKAUFMAN INTERFAITH INSTITUTE: $50,250 · OtherKAUFMAN INTERFAITH INSTITUTEGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,200 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $41,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO DIV: $25,000 · Other+42 more: $100,264 · Other+42 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $422,967 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+2 more: $1,050 · PhilanthropyTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $100,000 · InternationalTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $5,000 · InternationalASPEN ART MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureArts Midwest Incorporated: $20,100 · Arts & CultureANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $18,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $13,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Chicago: $70,000 · Education+4 more: $3,250 · EducationTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $66,975 · Social ScienceINTERFAITH AMERICA: $35,150 · ReligionJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $1,500 · Religion
Other$667,214Philanthropy$424,017International$105,000Arts & Culture$77,100Education$73,250Social Science$66,975Religion$36,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $422,967 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $66,975 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH AMERICA: $35,150 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetArts Midwest Incorporated: $20,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Jewish Center: $2,428 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSociety for Contemporary Art C-O The Art Institute of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELLIS SCHOOL: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREAD MUSKEGON: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIATION & RESTORATIVE SERVICES: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDERS OF MUSKEGON: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Arts Midwest Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Aspen Jewish Center ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Society for Contemporary Art C-O The Art Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Muskegon CountyMI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Muskegon County · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kaufman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kaufman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kaufman’s filings →

More from the funding graph