Skip to content

· Private foundation

Katz Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$55kCrime & Legal$46kReligion$46kCivil Rights$20kEducation$12kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$6kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$89k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $500 → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $500 → 13%KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 18 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$162k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+14%

Still filing today

22%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DEKALB COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $50k · revenue -22%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM
    5× · 2017–2024 · $45k
  • CO
    CITY OF SYCAMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT
    4× · 2017–2020 · $23k

Funded once

  • FT
    FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -15%
  • CD
    CASA DeKalb County Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +14%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Decalogue Society of Lawyers

The decalogue society of lawyers, founded in 1934, is the nation's oldest jewish bar association. its mission is to advance lawyers' professional development, raise the standards of the bar and bench, educate the public on legal and jewish…

—
2
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
3
Dekalb County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

Prevent/intervene in child abuse situations

Crime & Legal
4
Dekalb County Community Gardens

To build community while increasing food security through growing and providing ready access to fresh, nutritious local produce for dekalb county, illinois residents.

Community Improvement
5
Field Foundation of Illinois
—
6
Dekalb Library Foundation Inc

To support and enhance the dekalb county public library service, including support for literacy programs, children's reading programs, and georgia center for the book.

Education
7
Dekalb County Youth Shooting Sports
Recreation & Sports
8
Kent-Delord House Museum
—
9
Dekalb Community Impact Corporation

Responds to community needs with compassionate, Christ-centered programs and services

Recreation & Sports
10
Gila and David Kolb Family Foundation Inc
Religion
11
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
12
Leadership Dekalb Inc

Leadership dekalb convenes current and emerging leaders from diverse backgrounds, informs them about vital issues for a thriving and forward- looking dekalb county, and engages them to lead in ways that improve quality of life for all who…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEKALB COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherDEKALB COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATIONCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM: $45,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMCITY OF SYCAMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $22,500 · OtherCITY OF SYCAMORE POLICE DEPARTMENTCITY OF DEKALB POLICE DEPARTMENT: $12,500 · OtherCITY OF DEKALB POLICE DEPARTMENTDEKALB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $7,500 · Other+18 more: $22,950 · Other+18 moreFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION …CASA DeKalb County Inc: $5,000 · Civil RightsCASA DeKalb…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMA…DeKalb County History Center: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionKishwaukee United Way: $3,000 · PhilanthropyKISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $1,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 · International
Other$160,450Civil Rights$20,000Arts & Culture$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Philanthropy$3,000Human Services$1,500International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEKALB COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA DeKalb County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDeKalb County History Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKishwaukee United Way: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEKALB COUNTY FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA DeKalb County Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds DeKalb County History Center ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF DEKALB COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Kishwaukee United Way ↗
  • Who funds KISHWAUKEE FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dekalb County Community FoundationIL26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dekalb County Community Foundation · Ideal Industries Foundation · Douglas C & Lynn M Roberts Family Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · Me Stevens-Acct A-Church Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · The Chicago Community Trust · George E& Betty Bdutton Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Katz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Katz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Katz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Katz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Katz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph