Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kathryn Caine Wanlass Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$457k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$156k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$1.4MArts & Culture$1.2MHealth$70k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $435k
$55,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE$156,234
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$114,000
CORNERSTONE THEATRE COMPANY$60,000
SIDE STREET PROJECTS$55,000
INNER-CITY ARTS$50,000
SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC$12,000
YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $35k → 9%CORNERSTONE THEATRE COMPANY: $60k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS: $500 → 28%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $114k → 12%YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $35k → 9%CORNERSTONE THEATRE COMPANY: $60k → 14%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $105k → 12%YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $30k → 9%CORNERSTONE THEATRE COMPANY: $60k → 14%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $95k → 12%YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $30k → 9%CORNERSTONE THEATRE COMPANY: $60k → 14%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $80k → 12%YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $30k → 9%CORNERSTONE THEATRE COMPANY: $60k → 14%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $74k → 12%YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $10k → 9%CORNERSTONE THEATRE COMPANY: $60k → 14%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 12%ART DIVISION: $18k → 14%SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 12%ART DIVISION: $18k → 14%SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 12%ART DIVISION: $18k → 14%SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 12%ART DIVISION: $18k → 14%SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 12%OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $172k → 14%SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 12%INNER-CITY ARTS: $60k → 14%SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $169k → 14%INNER-CITY ARTS: $50k → 14%OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $156k → 14%INNER-CITY ARTS: $50k → 14%OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $148k → 14%INNER-CITY ARTS: $50k → 14%OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $136k → 14%INNER-CITY ARTS: $50k → 14%OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $91k → 14%INNER-CITY ARTS: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 8 repeat orgs$500 to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$2.7M
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $872k · revenue +37%
  • SS
    SIDE STREET PROJECTS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $330k · revenue +72%
  • IA
    INNER-CITY ARTS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $310k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • GI
    GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $500 · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
2
California Institute of the Arts

Calarts is a multidisciplinary community of artists. our ongoing educational endeavor is grounded in openness, experimentation, critical engagement, and creative freedom. through artistic practice, we transform ourselves, each other, and…

Arts & Culture
3
18TH Street Arts Complex

Support local artists through workshops, gallery exhibitions, and other educationalevents which reach out to the community at large; support local and internationalartists through renting spaces at rates below market value to artists…

Arts & Culture
4
Angels Gate Cultural Center Inc

To provide space for artists to work and to engage community through arts education, exhibitions of contemporary art, and cultural events.

Arts & Culture
5
Craft Contemporary

Craft contemporary challenges established ideas about craft and folk art and engages people through diverse exhibitions and programs.

Arts & Culture
6
New York School of the Arts Inc

New york school of the arts, inc. is a school offering courses and specialized workshops in painting, drawing, sculpture,printmaking,art theory and other subjects.

Education
7
Art Share Los Angeles

Promoting culturals arts in los angeles including education, gallery exhibits, artist living and work spaces theater, art and community festivals, artistic development and community outreach.

Arts & Culture
8
Laguna College of Art & Design

Laguna college of art & design prepares individuals for careers as creative artists and designers in a culturally and ethnically diverse world through a curriculum that emphasizes acquiring skills based on observation, representation, and…

Education
9
United Artist Collaborative
Arts & Culture
10
Gage Academy of Art

Gage educates, enriches, & transforms our community through the visual arts.

Arts & Culture
11
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
12
International Academy of Fine Art

The florence acadamy of art was founed in 1991 by daniel graves (see schedule o for details).

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inner-City Arts; the most unlike its peers is Art Division. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNERSTONE THEATER COMPANY: $360,000 · Arts & CultureCORNERSTONE THEATER COMPANYSIDE STREET PROJECTS: $330,000 · Arts & CultureSIDE STREET PROJECTSINNER-CITY ARTS: $310,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTSYELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $170,000 · Arts & CultureYELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUMArt Division: $70,000 · Arts & CultureArt DivisionOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $872,169 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COLLEGEUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $517,700 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYSUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · OtherSUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDAT…+1 more: $500 · Other
Arts & Culture$1,240,000Education$872,169Other$588,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $872,169 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE THEATER COMPANY: $360,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetSIDE STREET PROJECTS: $330,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $310,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetYELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM: $170,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetArt Division: $70,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds SIDE STREET PROJECTS ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Art Division ↗
  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kathryn Caine Wanlass Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kathryn Caine Wanlass Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kathryn Caine Wanlass’ filings →

    More from the funding graph