Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburn

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$4k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburn’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The New York Community Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburn named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $28k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
17
7
18
5
19
6
20
0
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Philanthropy$120kYouth Development$23kFood & Nutrition$18kHuman Services$17kArts & Culture$13kCrime & Legal$11kEducation$5kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISLAND FOOD PANTRY$4,000
UPPER VALLEY HAVEN$4,000
ECUMENICAL EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY OF WP$4,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WHITE PLAINS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,500
NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE$2,500
FIRST PEOPLES FUND$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
TABU ACADEMY$1,000
FOR THE LOVE OF ERIKA$500
CHEETAH CONSERVATION$250
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN'S LITERACY NETWORK: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
MI
NY
MA
SD
CA
VA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 50% of Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburn’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburnlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$61k · 10 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$61k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+122%
+222%

Still filing today

40%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Youth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHealthPublic BenefitInternationalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Neutral Zone
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +122%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +15%
  • FP
    FIRST PEOPLES FUND
    3× · 2018–2020 · $8k · revenue +296%

Funded once

  • BD
    Banco de Alimentos de Puerto Rico
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • YS
    YOUTH SPEAKS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -39%
  • AA
    ANN ARBOR TEEN CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
2
Foundation for Contemporary Arts Inc

To encourage, sponsor, and promote innovative work in the arts created and presented by individuals, groups, and organizations.

Arts & Culture
3
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
4
Cultural Vistas Inc

Cultural vistas leverages the power of international exchange to connect lives, enhance global skills, and drive positive change.

International
5
Center for Constitutional Rights

Ccr is a non-profit legal and educational organization dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the united states constitution the universal declaration of human rights. ccr stands with social justice movements…

Civil Rights
6
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
7
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
8
The Center for New York City Neighborhoods Inc

Our mission is to promote and protect affordable homeownership in new york so that middle- and working-class families are able to build strong, thriving communities.

Housing & Shelter
9
Culture for One

Cfo enriches the lives of nyc children in foster care through the transformative power of the arts. but nurturing their talents and interests, we empower children to envision brighter futures and pursue their full potential.

Arts & Culture
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

11
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
12
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Cultural Power and the most unlike its peers is Island Autism Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $119,836 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyISLAND FOOD PANTRY — $8,500 · OtherISLAND FOOD PANTRYWHITE PLAINS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherWHITE PLAINS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOU…Banco de Alimentos de Puerto Rico — $5,000 · OtherBanco de Alimentos de Puerto Ri…ANN ARBOR TEEN CENTER — $5,000 · OtherANN ARBOR TEEN CENTERECUMENICAL EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY OF WP — $4,500 · OtherECUMENICAL EMERGENCY FOOD PANTR…FOSTER CARE REVIEW INC — $4,000 · OtherFOSTER CARE REVIEW INCUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $4,000 · OtherUPPER VALLEY HAVENFOSTER CARE REVIEW PROGRAM — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER — $2,500 · OtherTABU ACADEMY INC — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · Other+10 more — $10,500 · Other+10 moreNeutral Zone — $13,300 · Youth DevelopmentNeutral Z…YOUTH SPEAKS INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH SPE…NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC — $11,000 · Crime & LegalFIRST PEOPLES FUND — $7,500 · Arts & CultureISLAND AUTISM GROUP INC — $2,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF VETERANS — $1,000 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$120,836Other$63,000Youth Development$18,300Crime & Legal$11,000Arts & Culture$7,500Health$2,000Public Benefit$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $119,836 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeutral Zone — $13,300 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC — $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFIRST PEOPLES FUND — $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTER CARE REVIEW INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND AUTISM GROUP INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE AFRICAN AMERICAN ART AND CULTURE COMPLEX — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR CULTURAL POWER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF VETERANS — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORY UNERASED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCheetah Conservation Fund — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST
  • Who funds Neutral Zone
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE INC
  • Who funds FIRST PEOPLES FUND
  • Who funds YOUTH SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds FOSTER CARE REVIEW INC
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN
  • Who funds ISLAND AUTISM GROUP INC
  • Who funds THE AFRICAN AMERICAN ART AND CULTURE COMPLEX
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR CULTURAL POWER
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF VETERANS
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds HISTORY UNERASED INC
  • Who funds CHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK
  • Who funds Cheetah Conservation Fund

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 33%
  • Upper Valley Haven38% of income from government
  • Foster Care Review Inc33% of income from government
  • History Unerased Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburn?

Find your warmest path to Kass Family Foundation Inc Stephen Kass-Carterledyard & Milburn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph