Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karsten Family Foundation Inc Dba Amy Hope Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$102kEducation$43kHuman Services$38kCommunity Improvement$18kReligion$16kPhilanthropy$12kHousing & Shelter$6kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$608k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON$30,000
AMAZON SMILE$7,049
THE NET FORT WORTH$6,000
JUSTINS PLACE$3,500
CY - HOPE$2,602
PURMERCY HOUSE GLO$2,500
CWBBA$1,100
TMF$500
BIRDIES FOR CHARITY$500
FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY$350
AAUW$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROCKPORT - FULTON GOOD SAMARITANS: $6k → 17%JUSTINS PLACE: $8k → 11%JUSTINS PLACE: $4k → 11%JUSTINS PLACE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
PA
CA
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 12 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$180k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+18%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $82k · revenue +46%
  • TN
    THE NET FW INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +43%
  • CI
    CY-HOPE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • RG
    ROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARINC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +18%
  • P
    PATHFINDERS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Hope

Global hope exists to empower vulnerable women in regions impacted by conflict and provide hope through emergency response, education, empowerment and protection, economic development, and community engagement so that women are liberated,…

International
2
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International
3
Speak Up for the Poor

Speak Up exists to transform the world on behalf of the poor. Our mission is to create a new reality for girls in poverty. We work toward this goal through educational programs support of safe homes and practical legal work.

International
4
Fos Feminista Fund

Fos feminista fund was formed exclusively for charitable purposes to support, foster, aid, and enhance access to contraception, responsible parenthood, reproductive health, and empowerment of women and shall aid and support the activities…

Health
5
Aid for Women Inc

Aid for Women operates pregnancy help centers, pregnancy medical clinics and residential programs to assist women in difficult and unexpected pregnancy situations so that they might choose life.

—
6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
7
Water By Women

Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.

Human Services
8
Together for Girls

We envision a world where every child, adolescent and young person is safe, protected and thriving. every person, including every child and adolescent, has the right to live free from violence and everyone has a role to play in making this…

International
9
Casa Teresa Inc

To provide a temporary home and on-going support for pregnant women, and women with newborns over the age of 18 who are alone. counseling and educational programs prepare these women to make loving and informed decisions for themselves and…

Human Services
10
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
11
Woman Inc

W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…

Health
12
The Women's Resource of Greater Houston

See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Hungry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Changing Tides Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $81,560 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONAL+2 more: $3,751 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONK-LIFE MINISTRIES: $13,000 · OtherK-LIFE MINISTRIESAMAZON SMILE: $8,593 · OtherAMAZON SMILEUNION GOSPEL MISSION: $6,313 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSIONBIRDIES FOR CHARITY: $5,688 · OtherBIRDIES FOR CHARITYPATHFINDERS: $3,000 · OtherPrincess Promise Inc: $8,500 · OtherPrincess Promise IncAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,963 · Other+9 more: $9,939 · Other+9 moreJUSTINS PLACE: $13,000 · Human ServicesROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARINC: $5,500 · Human ServicesTHE NET FW INC: $18,000 · Community ImprovementCY-HOPE INC: $13,005 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $11,580 · PhilanthropyMercy House Ministries Inc: $9,250 · Housing & Shelter
International$85,311Other$87,996Human Services$18,500Community Improvement$18,000Education$13,105Philanthropy$11,580Housing & Shelter$9,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $81,560 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NET FW INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCY-HOPE INC: $13,005 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUSTINS PLACE: $13,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $11,580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy House Ministries Inc: $9,250 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPrincess Promise Inc: $8,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARINC: $5,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,963 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $2,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGING TIDES FOUNDATION: $1,701 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE NET FW INC ↗
  • Who funds CY-HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTINS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy House Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Princess Promise Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKPORT-FULTON GOOD SAMARINC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANGING TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karsten Family Foundation Inc Dba Amy Hope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karsten Family Foundation Inc Dba Amy Hope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Karsten Family Foundation Inc Dba Amy Hope Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Karsten Family Foundation Inc Dba Amy Hope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Karsten Family Foundation Inc Dba Amy Hope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph