Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Karis Foundation Barney Barron Co-Trustee

$55k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$22k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

74% of Karis Foundation Barney Barron Co-Trustee’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Karis Foundation Barney Barron Co-Trustee named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $55k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
7
18
8
19
7
20
1
21
3
22
4
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Religion$127kPhilanthropy$55kEducation$31kRecreation & Sports$5kInternational$2kHuman Services$1kEmployment$500Other$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BIBLE PROJECT$22,200
FORUM OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS$13,000
CRU$5,000
JEWS FOR JESUS$5,000
GLOBAL SCHOLARS #123$5,000
ZOLA LEVITT MINISTRIES$3,000
BETHEDEN MINISTRIES$1,000
FAITH & LEARNING INTERNATIONAL$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%JEWS FOR JESUS: $10k → 10%THE MASTER'S SEMINARY: $1k → 14%ZOLA LEVITT MINISTRIES: $12k → 14%VOICE OF MARTYRS: $500 → 14%MEADOWS CENTER FOR OPPORTUNITY INC: $500 → 16%PROVIDENCE BAPTIST CHURCH: $350 → 11%CRU MINISTRIES: $9k → 13%BETHEDEN MINISTRIES: $1k → 12%FAITH AND LEARNING INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 5%THE BIBLE PROJECT: $22k → 12%FORUM OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS: $13k → 7%SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 9%DAILY DOSE OF HEBREW: $750 → 15%JEWS FOR JESUS: $5k → 10%THE MASTER'S SEMINARY: $1k → 14%ZOLA LEVITT MINISTRIES: $6k → 14%COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER: $5k → 16%CRU MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%THE BIBLE PROJECT: $6k → 12%FORUM OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS: $13k → 7%JEWS FOR JESUS: $2k → 10%THE MASTER'S SEMINARY: $500 → 14%ZOLA LEVITT MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%THE BIBLE PROJECT: $4k → 12%FORUM OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS: $6k → 7%JEWS FOR JESUS: $2k → 10%BIBLE PROJECT: $1k → 12%FAITH & LEARNING INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 7%JEWS FOR JESUS: $1k → 10%BIBLE PROJECT: $1k → 12%FAITH & LEARNING INTERNATIONAL: $750 → 7%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $55k → 10%THE BIBLE PROJECT: $350 → 12%FAITH & LEARNING INTERNATIONAL: $750 → 7%FORUM OF CHRISTIAN LEADERS: $600 → 7%FAITH & LEARNING INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
OR
CA
KY
VA
KS
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$167k · 10 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$167k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+88%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionEducationRecreation & SportsEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BIBLEPROJECT
    6× · 2018–2023 · $34k · revenue +336%
  • FA
    Faith and Learning International NFP
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +138%
  • TM
    The Master's University and Seminary
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • HO
    HEART OF GOD MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $800 · revenue +88%
  • DD
    DAILY DOSE OF HEBREW
    one grant, 2019 · $750
  • VO
    VOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
3
Biblical Education By Extension Inc

To assist the church, primarily in closed countries, in the establishment of continuing indigenous church-based training centers in which servant leaders are equipped to develop growing and reproducing churches.

Religion
4
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
5
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

6
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
7
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
8
Josiah Venture

To equip young leaders throughout Central and Eastern Europe to fulfill Christ's commission through the local church.

Religion
9
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
10
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
11
C4I Christians for Israel

To present a biblical perspective of god's plans and purpose for israel and the church

Religion
12
Biblica Inc

To provide the bible in accurate, contemporary translations and formats so that more people around the world will have the opportunity to be transformed by jesus christ.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bibleproject and the most unlike its peers is Heart of God Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GLOBAL SCHOLARS — $27,000 · OtherGLOBAL SCHOLARSZola Levitt Ministries Inc — $20,500 · OtherZola Levitt Ministries IncJEWS FOR JESUS — $19,800 · OtherJEWS FOR JESUSCRU MINISTRIES — $13,500 · OtherCRU MINISTRIESCRU — $13,300 · OtherCRU+6 more — $5,600 · Other+6 moreBIBLEPROJECT — $34,050 · ReligionBIBLEPROJECTForum of Christian Leaders — $31,900 · ReligionForum of Christian LeadersFaith and Learning International NFP — $3,500 · Religion+2 more — $1,200 · ReligionDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $54,969 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE G…COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Master's University and Seminary — $2,750 · EducationBETHEDEN MINISTRIES — $1,000 · Arts & CultureThe Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc — $500 · Employment
Other$99,700Religion$70,650Philanthropy$54,969Recreation & Sports$5,000Education$2,750Arts & Culture$1,000Employment$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $54,969 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT — $34,050 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetForum of Christian Leaders — $31,900 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBAL SCHOLARS — $27,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetZola Levitt Ministries Inc — $20,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetFaith and Learning International NFP — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Master's University and Seminary — $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF GOD MINISTRIES INC — $800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChina Aid Association Inc — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT
  • Who funds Forum of Christian Leaders
  • Who funds GLOBAL SCHOLARS
  • Who funds Zola Levitt Ministries Inc
  • Who funds COFFEE CREEK RIDING CENTER
  • Who funds Faith and Learning International NFP
  • Who funds The Master's University and Seminary
  • Who funds BETHEDEN MINISTRIES
  • Who funds HEART OF GOD MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds The Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc
  • Who funds China Aid Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Karis Foundation Barney Barron Co-Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph