Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karen Sue Lieber Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$551kHuman Services$41kHealth$31kYouth Development$12kEducation$11kRecreation & Sports$11kPublic Benefit$8kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$452k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$2,500
THE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC$1,000
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF MCDONOUGH CO$1,000
WEST SIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF SPRINGFIELD ILLINOIS$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DEFENDERS OF FREEDOM: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$536k · 5 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +372% since the first grant, against +81% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
22

Total granted

$536k
$196k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+372%
+81%

Still filing today

20%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER OF CHICAGO
    5× · 2017–2022 · $499k · revenue +372% · 49% of their budget
  • YB
    YOUTH BE HEARD
    3× · 2019–2024 · $12k
  • GH
    GLENWOOD HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2020 · $10k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • YO
    YMCA OF SPRINGFIELD IL
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC RESEARCH FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honor Flight of Dubuque and the Tri States

Honor Flight of Dubuque and the Tri-States is a non-profit organization created to honor veterans living in northeast Iowa, southwest Wisconsin, and northwest Illinois for all their sacrifices. We transport our heroes to Washington DC to…

Public Benefit
2
Mike Q Daniel Ministries

Online platform to share gods grace

Religion
3
Veterans Honor Flight of Southern Illinois

Taking veterans on flights to washington dc

Public Benefit
4
Honor Flight Chicago Corp

To recognize the bravery, determination and patriotism of America's Seniorveterans with an all-expense paid, one-of-a-kind journey to Washington DCfor a day of honor, thanks and inspiration. Since formation, throughSeptember 30, 2025, the…

Human Services
5
Illinois Mennonite Camp Assn Inc

Provide a spiritual ministry through a camp setting

Religion
6
Honor Flight Austin

Our goal is helping every single veteran in Texas, willing and able of getting on a plane or a bus, visit THEIR memorial.

Public Benefit
7
Honor Flight of the Ozarks

Fly veterans to washington dc

Human Services
8
Bonnie Floyd Ministries

Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ and provide assistance to the needy

Religion
9
Honor Flight Philadelphia Corporation

Transport Americas veterans to Washington, D.C. to visit those memorials dedicated to honor their service and sacrifices.

Public Benefit
10
Discipling Ministries International Inc

To provide Ministry Support/Humanitarian Relief

International
11
Return of the King Fellowship

Global missionary support

Religion
12
Go Tell Crusades Inc F/K/a Rick Gage Evangelistic Assoc

Promote gospel of jesus christ

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Contact Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Quincy Park Board Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOPE CENTER OF CHICAGO: $499,328 · ReligionTHE HOPE CENTER OF CHICAGO+1 more: $500 · ReligionIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYMCA OF SPRINGFIELD IL: $25,000 · OtherYMCA OF SPRINGFIELD ILCLEVELAND CLINIC RESEARCH FOUNDATIO: $25,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC RESEARCH FOUNDAT…BETHESDA BAPTIST CHURCH: $18,250 · OtherBETHESDA BAPTIST CHURCHCALVARY CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherCALVARY CHURCHHOPE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF SPRINGIELD: $12,170 · OtherHOPE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF S…YOUTH BE HEARD: $12,000 · OtherYOUTH BE HEARDGLENWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $10,165 · OtherIHDN: $10,000 · Other+16 more: $39,167 · Other+16 moreQUINCY PARK BOARD FOUNDATION: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsGREAT RIVER HONOR FLIGHT: $5,000 · Public BenefitDefenders of Freedom: $2,700 · Human ServicesTHE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Health
Religion$499,828Other$216,752Recreation & Sports$11,000Public Benefit$5,000Human Services$2,700Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOPE CENTER OF CHICAGO: $499,328 over 5y, 49% of budgetGREAT RIVER HONOR FLIGHT: $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCONTACT MINISTRIES: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDefenders of Freedom: $2,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Assoc of McDonough Co: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds QUINCY PARK BOARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RIVER HONOR FLIGHT ↗
  • Who funds CONTACT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Freedom ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Assoc of McDonough Co ↗
  • Who funds THE BLESSING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Living on the Edge Ministries Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karen Sue Lieber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karen Sue Lieber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Karen Sue Lieber Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Karen Sue Lieber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Karen Sue Lieber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph