Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karen R & John T Crotty Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$239kReligion$159kFood & Nutrition$102kInternational$90kEnvironment$81kArts & Culture$58kEducation$58kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$15,000
ST JAMES$10,750
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$10,500
LAKE BLUFF OPEN LANDS ASSOC$8,000
BOWEN HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
SALVATION ARMY$6,000
WFMT$5,000
PADS$5,000
WTTW$5,000
FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION$5,000
NAMI CHICAGO$5,000
EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA$5,000
COOL FOOD PANTRIES OF LAKE COUNTY$5,000
SOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATION$4,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MATTHIAS ACADEMY: $51k → 10%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 14%MATTHIAS ACADEMY: $25k → 10%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS: $1k → 10%MATTHIAS ACADEMY: $12k → 10%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS: $1k → 10%MATTHIAS ACADEMY: $10k → 10%NAPLES SENIOR CENTER AT JFCS: $750 → 10%MATTHIAS ACADEMY: $6k → 10%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 8%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 8%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 8%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER: $500 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO WHITE SOX CHARITIES: $2k → 14%CHICAGO WHITE SOX CHARITIES: $1k → 14%WHITE SOX CHARITIES: $600 → 14%LAKE FOREST - LAKE BLUFF SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%LAKE FOREST LAKE BLUFF SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
NM
AR
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$964k · 54 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
40

Total granted

$964k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+48%

Still filing today

61%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentHealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $104k · revenue ×34
  • MF
    Metropolitan Family Services
    3× · 2017–2019 · $70k · revenue +332%
  • LB
    LAKE BLUFF OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOISgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +72%
  • UJ
    UIC JANE ADDAMS COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORK
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
4
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation (nff), chartered by congress, turns america's love of nature into meaningful action for 193-million acre national forest system through on the ground program work and grant making activities, and accepts and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
6
Institute for Journalism & Natural Resources

The organization pursues higher standards of news coverage of natural resources and the environment -- standards of accuracy, fairness, balance, depth and context.

Arts & Culture
7
Climate Central Inc

Climate central, inc. (the organization") is an independent not-for-profit organization of leading scientists, technology experts and communication professionals that are dedicated to researching and reporting on climate change and its…

Science & Tech
8
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
9
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
10
Ceres Inc

Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…

Environment
11
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
12
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lake Bluff Open Lands Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/55
Grantees still filing
46/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JAMES LUTHERAN CHURCH: $114,000 · OtherST JAMES LUTHERAN CHURCHCOOL FOOD PANTRIES OF LAKE COUNTY: $51,000 · OtherCOOL FOOD PANTRIES OF LAKE COUNTYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $44,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYWFMT: $39,700 · OtherWFMTST JAMES: $25,750 · OtherNORTH CHICAGO COMM PARTNERS: $25,500 · OtherSOUTHWEST INDIAN FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $20,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $23,000 · Other+66 more: $215,225 · Other+66 moreMATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION: $104,140 · Human ServicesMATTHIAS ACADEMY CO…Metropolitan Family Services: $70,000 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family…+5 more: $11,850 · Human Services+5 moreThe Foundation for Tomorrow Inc: $40,300 · EducationThe Founda…AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $38,500 · EducationAMERICAN I…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $14,000 · EducationUNITED NEG…+2 more: $3,500 · EducationLAKE BLUFF OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $45,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $10,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUND INC: $3,000 · Environment+3 more: $3,300 · EnvironmentWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 · PhilanthropyROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyPADS Lake County Inc: $41,000 · Health+4 more: $3,500 · HealthNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $35,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$598,175Human Services$185,990Education$96,300Environment$70,300Philanthropy$48,000Health$44,500Food & Nutrition$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION: $104,140 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE BLUFF OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $45,500 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc: $41,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe Foundation for Tomorrow Inc: $40,300 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $38,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPADS OF ELGIN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI Chicago: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Family Institute: $5,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetChicago White Sox Charities Inc: $3,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOTTEY COLLEGE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLake Bluff History Museum: $2,225 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAREER RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE FOREST-LAKE BLUFF SENIOR CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN IMMIGRATION & REFUGEE SERVICE INC DBA GLOBAL REFUGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds LAKE BLUFF OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PADS Lake County Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for Tomorrow Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds PADS OF ELGIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAMI Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE RIDGES SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Family Institute ↗
  • Who funds FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Schultz Family Private FoundationIL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Schultz Family Private Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Edwards Family Cjlj Foundation · Lumw Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Baxter International Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karen R & John T Crotty Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karen R & John T Crotty Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service Inc Dba Global Refuge: 100% of income from government
  • Center for Coastal Studies Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Karen R & John T Crotty Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Karen R & John T Crotty Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Karen R & John T Crotty’s filings →

More from the funding graph