Skip to content

· Private foundation

Karen and Jason Sussman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$218kPhilanthropy$114kReligion$61kArts & Culture$8kCivil Rights$6kCommunity Improvement$1kHuman Services$700International$398Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AM YISREAL CONSERVATIVE CONGREGATION$18,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$15,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$15,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$12,500
Northshore Hospitals Foundation$2,100
THE ARK$1,800
HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION$1,500
Cancer Wellness Center$1,000
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$1,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$500
CITY OF HOPE$500
WBEZ$365
PJ LIBRARY$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Athelas Institute Inc: $250 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$519k · 26 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
28

Total granted

$519k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

69%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +13%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +145%
  • EH
    Endeavor Health Clinical Operations
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • AY
    Am Yisrael Conservative Congregation
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • NU
    Northshore University HealthSystem Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • SF
    St Francis Xavier Church
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
8
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Karen Dove Cabral Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $160,560 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAm Yisrael Conservative Congregation: $24,700 · OtherAm Yisrael Conservative CongregationAM YISREAL CONSERVATIVE CONGREGATION: $18,000 · OtherAM YISREAL CONSERVATIVE CONGREGATIONTHE ARK: $16,263 · OtherTHE ARK+30 more: $16,872 · Other+30 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $86,200 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $75,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $16,850 · HealthEndeavor Health Clinical OperationsHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $13,000 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION+10 more: $16,310 · Health+10 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $112,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF …+1 more: $1,200 · PhilanthropyThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,500 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $4,500 · Crime & LegalA HUMAN THREAD FOUNDATION: $200 · Crime & LegalTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,750 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOOD: $180 · Public Safety & DisasterWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $500 · Religion
Other$236,395Health$207,860Philanthropy$113,700Arts & Culture$5,500Crime & Legal$4,700Public Safety & Disaster$3,930Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $112,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $86,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $75,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $16,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER WELLNESS CENTER: $6,450 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKAREN DOVE CABRAL FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,006 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $298 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATHELAS INSTITUTE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildcare Network of Evanston: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds KAREN DOVE CABRAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS (AMERICAN SECTION) INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds ATHELAS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Karen and Jason Sussman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Karen and Jason Sussman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Lifebridge Health Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Karen and Jason Sussman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Karen and Jason Sussman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Karen and Jason Sussman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph