· Public charity
Kappa Delta Foundation Incorporated
The kappa delta foundation unites sisters to invest in one another, fostering a legacy of support and empowerment.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $1,676,521 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,907,463 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,230,942 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $109k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $213k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALPHA MU HOUSING CORPORATION OF KAPPA DELTA | $533,394 |
| PREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA | $512,375 |
| KAPPA DELTA SORORITY | $295,397 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF THE USA | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS | $60,000 |
| SIGMA TAU HOUSE CORPORATION | $53,047 |
| EPSILON IOTA HOUSE CORPORATION | $37,308 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE | $25,000 |
| EPSILON ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION | $21,500 |
| KIDS HUB CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $7,500 |
| REGIONAL INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KDKAPPA DELTA SORORITY INCORPORATED9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +30%
- AMAlpha Mu Housing Corporation of Kappa Delta3× · 2020–2025 · $832k · revenue +154%
- ZGZETA GAMMA HOUSE CORPORATION4× · 2020–2023 · $816k · revenue +18% · 25% of their budget
Funded once
- SPSigma Psi Housing LLCone grant, 2024 · $526k
- PHPrisma Health-Upstategraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +57%
- CMCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ST TAMMANY INCone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Housing corporation of nu kappa chapter of chi omega
The corporation is organized for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, and to provide pediatric home health care, alternate site and other pediatric services to pediatric patients. in addition, kids home care conducts health…
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
Alpha chi omega makes a promise to empower each member to become the best version of herself. the real. strong. women. experience delivers on this promise by providing an environment where members take on the issues and challenges that…
Collegiate sorority housing
Sigma kappa fosters lifelong connection in sisterhood while being true to our founding as an intellectual and social women's sorority. through mutual support and respect, we inspire all members to lead a life of purpose.
The kappa delta foundation unites sisters to invest in one another, fostering a legacy of support and empowerment. through scholarships, leadership programs, charitable efforts and member assistance, the foundation advances the mission of…
Children's services
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
To enhance the experience of alpha chi omega's collegiate members through the promotion, support and development of appropriate, desirable and safe facilities.
To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.
To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital and the most unlike its peers is 4THEKIDS Baton Rouge Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds KAPPA DELTA SORORITY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Alpha Mu Housing Corporation of Kappa Delta ↗
- Who funds ZETA GAMMA HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds SIGMA OMICRON HOUSE CORPORATION OF KAPPA DELTA SORORITY A VIRGINIA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Sigma Tau of Kappa Delta Housing Associa ↗
- Who funds KAPPA DELTA EPSILON IOTA HOUSE CORP ↗
- Who funds VCU Health Childrens Services at Brook Road ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
- Who funds KAPPA DELTA SORORITY ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FRATERNAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF HIDALGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ST TAMMANY INC ↗
- Who funds 4THEKIDS BATON ROUGE INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS HUB ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERED TO CONNECT ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COMPASS ↗
- Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds His Little Feet ↗
- Who funds CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kappa Delta Foundation Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kappa Delta Foundation Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Kappa Delta Foundation Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.