Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kapoor Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$28kHousing & Shelter$14kHealth$4kFood & Nutrition$4kInternational$2kHuman Services$2kYouth Development$1kArts & Culture$760Other$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMAH INC$1,008
BE HAPPY INC$1,001
HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY$696
SECOND HARVEST OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$200
FEEDING AMERICA$200
COVENANT HOUSE$150
ST JUDE$150
MAKE A WISH AMERICA$100
THE SALVATION ARMY$100
UNICEF$100
AMERICAN RED CROSS$100
FOOD FOR THE POOR$100
MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH$100
SAVE THE CHILDREN$100
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%SECOND HARVEST: $200 → 11%SECOND HARVEST: $200 → 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $50 → 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $90 → 12%SECOND HARVEST: $200 → 11%AIM FOR SEVA: $500 → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $50 → 11%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $37 → 11%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%BOYS TOWN: $75 → 12%BETHLEHEM EMERGENCY SHELTERING: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Kapoor Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 48%.

Kapoor Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 44 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
24

Total granted

$52k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+43%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $950 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BE HAPPY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +38%
  • Feeding America
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1k · revenue +84%
  • AM
    ANOOPAM MISSION INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $1k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • NV
    NAMAH VENDANTIC CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $501
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD HOME
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
5
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
8
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
9
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
12
Water for People

Water for people exists to develop high quality water and sanitation, accessible to all, and sustained by strong communities, businesses, and governments, working in ten countries; guatemala, honduras, tanzania, peru, bolivia, uganda,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Be Happy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $10,474 · OtherHINDU TEMPLE SOCIETYNAMAH INC: $4,218 · OtherNAMAH INCARSHA-VIDYA-PITAM: $3,000 · OtherARSHA-VIDYA-PITAMMEALS ON WHEELS: $1,400 · OtherNAMAH VENDANTIC CENTER: $1,203 · Other+49 more: $12,862 · Other+49 moreALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC: $13,521 · Housing & ShelterALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION …BE HAPPY INC: $4,241 · ReligionBE HAPPY I…ANOOPAM MISSION INC: $1,302 · ReligionANOOPAM MI…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $875 · HealthCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $550 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $175 · Health+2 more: $100 · HealthSecond Harvest: $600 · Human ServicesALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $500 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $375 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $227 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc: $425 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $400 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $400 · InternationalAID FOR STARVING CHILDREN: $100 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $100 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $100 · International+2 more: $100 · InternationalFeeding America: $1,410 · Food & Nutrition
Other$33,157Housing & Shelter$13,521Religion$5,543Health$2,100Human Services$1,752International$1,625Food & Nutrition$1,410

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC: $13,521 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBE HAPPY INC: $4,241 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFeeding America: $1,410 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANOOPAM MISSION INC: $1,302 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetARTSQUEST: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $425 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $375 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $275 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $227 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOC WAYNE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $175 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAID FOR STARVING CHILDREN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLV PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP WLVT-TV CHANNEL 39: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABANDONED CHILDRENS FUND: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM EMERGENCY SHELTERING INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLENTOWN RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BE HAPPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ANOOPAM MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTSQUEST ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS WISH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Salvaggio Family FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Salvaggio Family Foundation · Martin Guitar Charitable Foundation · Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kapoor Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kapoor Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Doc Wayne Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kapoor’s filings →

More from the funding graph