· Public charity
Kansas City Children's Assistance Network
Kc can!
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $81,980 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $94,470 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,490 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KC AUTISM TRAINING CENTER | $18,980 |
| WONDERSCOPE | $18,000 |
| KIDS HAIR & SKILL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM | $15,000 |
| POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF KCKS | $12,500 |
| SLEEPYHEAD BEDS | $10,000 |
| BIRTHDAY CONNECTIONS | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Keeping kids safe, inc. is devoted to provide safe loving foster homes for children. we are dedicated to model and teach christian values and morals while empowering children to thrive emotionally, socially, cognitively and physically.
Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…
To provide advocacy services to LGBTQ victims and survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and hate crimes.
Empowering Parent believes strong families are the foundation of strong communities, therefore we restore and unite families by providing therapeutic, parent aide, and mentor services
The Racial Equity Collaborative REC executes programming that brings together families mandated reporters the child welfare workforce and other human service providers to build shared multi-disciplinary knowledge and accountability in…
KCSIC manages a portfolio of programs, projects and pilots that create a network for technology, community, investment, education and business sectors to work directly with youth, and come together to solve Kansas City's biggest problems…
To protect and nurture children at risk by developing, supporting, serving, and protecting the interests of children.
To equip and empower youth, adults, and families to become healthier and contributing members of the community by providing compassionate emotional and behavioral intensive residential treatment & qualified residential treatment for ages…
To provided asset based progras, and opportunities for sustainable growth and development, where children, youth, and families can flourish in Kansas City east side. Our vision is to develop healthy communities where the vulnerable can…
To educate, mentor & support youth with disabilities to be contributingmembers of their community.
To break the cycle of domestic violence and partner abuse for victims and their children by providing shelter, advocacy, counseling and prevention education in our community.
Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Love Fund for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samuel U Rodgers Health Care Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 21. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mothers Refuge ↗
- Who funds NEWHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SCREEN SANITY INC ↗
- Who funds SLEEPYHEAD BEDS ↗
- Who funds AVENUE OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds THE GEM THEATER CULTURAL AND PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Community Services League of Jackson County ↗
- Who funds SUNFLOWER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY AUTISM TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WONDERSCOPE INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INCLUSION CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Samuel U Rodgers Health Care Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Exceeds Expectations Inc ↗
- Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF KCKS ↗
- Who funds Rosedale Development Association ↗
- Who funds LOVE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WECODE KC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Health Forward Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · Greater Horizons · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kansas City Children's Assistance Network funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.