Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kane Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$78kInternational$62kEducation$52kPhilanthropy$32kCivil Rights$23kHealth$21kHuman Services$15kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
19
States reached
$1000k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHELSEA'S FUND WYOMING REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$3,000
LANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION CHALLENGE FOR CHARITY$2,500
SPRING STREET CLIMATE FUND$2,000
AMERICARES$2,000
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDRENESS ALLIANCE$2,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$2,000
JUST THE PILL$1,600
EDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN$1,200
FREINDS OF ISLAND INITIATIVES$1,000
HUDSON LINK HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON$1,000
MY COMMUNITY NURSE PROJECT$1,000
IPAS PARTNERS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUCTICE$1,000
ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE$1,000
GRATEFUL HEARTS MANCHESTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $1k → 11%ASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE: $1k → 11%REIMAGINE INC: $600 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325k · 53 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
48

Total granted

$325k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+11%

Still filing today

51%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalEducationHealthArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +68%
  • SU
    Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
    8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +134%
  • CF
    CHELSEA'S FUND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +40%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +0%
  • ME
    MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +424%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
6
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is African Parks Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Carter Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/66
Grantees still filing
38/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF GATOTO: $43,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF GATOTOIndividual grant recipient: $42,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIONS: $8,500 · OtherRocky Mountain Institute: $7,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISLAND INITIATIVES: $7,000 · Other+71 more: $81,050 · Other+71 moreAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $29,450 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATI…International Rescue Committee INC: $10,950 · InternationalInternational Rescu…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $7,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCER…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONT…Save The Children Federation Inc: $3,450 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3,450 · InternationalEDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN: $3,400 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · International+4 more: $5,100 · International+4 moreWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL: $25,800 · EnvironmentWYOMING OUTDOOR…Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $16,500 · EnvironmentSouthern Utah W…THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATIO…+10 more: $5,900 · Environment+10 moreLANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,500 · EducationLANDER COM…HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC: $5,000 · EducationHUDSON LIN…Trustees of Dartmouth College: $4,200 · EducationTrustees o…SKIDMORE COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationSKIDMORE C…+6 more: $2,250 · Education+6 moreCHELSEA'S FUND: $16,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Civil RightsMy Community Nurse Project Inc: $3,550 · HealthCARTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,400 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $1,000 · HealthUNITE 2 FIGHT PARALYSIS: $1,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $400 · HealthORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION: $3,500 · Public BenefitRepresentUs: $2,500 · Public BenefitCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND: $400 · Public Benefit
Other$204,050International$70,300Environment$54,200Education$37,950Civil Rights$23,500Health$11,850Public Benefit$6,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $29,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL: $25,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHELSEA'S FUND: $16,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $4,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMy Community Nurse Project Inc: $3,550 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION: $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $3,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3,450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN: $3,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRepresentUs: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 18% of budgetPRO MUJER INC: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASCENTRIA CARE ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIQRA Fund: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetON THIS SPOT NYC STORIES OF PIONEERING WOMEN ARTISTS INC: $1,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRATEFUL HEARTS MANCHESTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITE 2 FIGHT PARALYSIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Nonviolence Chicago: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBURR & BURTON SEMINARY: $750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT HUTS ASSOCIATION LTD: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOMA PROJECT INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREIMAGINE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR APPLIED ECOLOGY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANDER ART CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds CHELSEA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON LINK FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds My Community Nurse Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RepresentUs ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CARTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRO MUJER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kane Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kane Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Institute for Applied Ecology: 99% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Burr & Burton Seminary: 2% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kane Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph