Skip to content
Kalispell Regional Healthcare Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Kalispell Regional Healthcare Foundation

The logan health foundation dedicated to supporting logan health, a 501(c)(3) health system, in its mission to foster healthier lives, stronger communities, and brighter futures.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$953k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$21MEducation$31kFood & Nutrition$15k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $1,226,148, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,622,870 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $396,722 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $222k
  • $250k+1 grant · $953k
$59,322
Median grant
1
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$953,358
LOGAN HEALTH$90,608
LOGAN HEALTH - WHITEFISH$72,290
ASSIST-FLATHEAD VALLEY$59,322
SUMMIT MEDICAL FITNESS CENTER$28,304
MONTANA LAND TO HAND$15,000
NORTHWEST HORIZON$7,266
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $547k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOGAN HEALTH - SHELBY: $443k → 11%ASSIST-FLATHEAD VALLEY: $59k → 11%ASSIST-FLATHEAD VALLEY: $45k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 4 repeat orgs$465k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +86% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$20M
$371k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+86%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19M · revenue +88%
  • TS
    THE SUMMIT MEDICAL FITNESS CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $365k · revenue +9%
  • LH
    LOGAN HEALTH
    2× · 2018–2024 · $176k · revenue +596%

Funded once

  • LH
    LOGAN HEALTH - CONRAD
    one grant, 2023 · $190k · revenue +22%
  • MP
    MONTANA PEDIATRICSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +104%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Logan Health - Shelby

Logan health shelby is a 21-bed 501(c)(3), non-profit, community critical access hospital located in shelby, montana. the hospital serves toole county and surrounding communities providing emergency care, acute care, skilled swing bed…

Health
2
Logan Health - Cut Bank

Logan health - cut bank provides quality healthcare that serves our communities in a private, safe, and caring environment.

Health
3
Liberty County Hospital & Nursing Home

Our 25-bed critical access hospital, 18-bed assisted living facility, and rural health clinic provide inpatient and outpatient care to residents in liberty county and the surrounding area.

Health
4
Billings Clinic

Billings clinic's mission is quality, compassionate cre for all, with a vision of reimagining health care through connection, service and innovation.

Health
5
Kalispell Regional Healthcare Foundation

The logan health foundation dedicated to supporting logan health, a 501(c)(3) health system, in its mission to foster healthier lives, stronger communities, and brighter futures.

Philanthropy
6
Townsend Health Systems Inc

The delivery of healthcare services, the conduct of medical research, the furtherance of health education and the promotion of general health in townsend and the surrounding area.

—
7
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
8
Stillwater Hospital Association

Stillwater hospital association is a rural integrated health care organization bringing together a physician clinic and hospital services to deliver quality coordinated care.

Health
9
LincolnHealth Group

LincolnHealth Group (LHG) was established to promote and support integrated & cost-effective health care services for the residents and visitors of Lincoln County, Maine.

—
10
Lincolnhealth

LincolnHealth is dedicated to maintaining and improving the health of our communities by assuring: the very best, highest quality, and compassionate health care services from highly trained professionals; our services are cost-effective…

—
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Billings Clinic Foundation

To advance excellence in healthcare, education and research at billings clinic through philanthropy. funds raised by the foundation are used by billings clinic to construct and upgrade facilities, purchase patient care equipment, enhance…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kalispell Regional Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Kalispell Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $19,392,901 · HealthKALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER+6 more: $961,158 · HealthASSIST - FLATHEAD VALLEY: $546,961 · Human ServicesDUKE UNIVERSITY: $18,447 · EducationKALISPELL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,175 · EducationMONTANA LAND TO HAND: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$20,354,059Human Services$546,961Education$30,622Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $19,392,901 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetASSIST - FLATHEAD VALLEY: $546,961 over 5y, 32% of budgetTHE SUMMIT MEDICAL FITNESS CENTER: $365,277 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetLOGAN HEALTH - CONRAD: $190,070 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLOGAN HEALTH: $176,255 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMONTANA PEDIATRICS: $150,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetLOGAN HEALTH - WHITEFISH: $72,290 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $18,447 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA LAND TO HAND: $15,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKALISPELL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,175 over 1y, 11% of budgetNORTHWEST HORIZONS INC: $7,266 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Heart Associ…Montana Health Resear…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Heart Association IncTX15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · Montana Health Research & Education Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kalispell Regional Healthcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kalispell Regional Healthcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kalispell Regional Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home