Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kahng Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$7.1MHealth$1.0MEducation$863kScience & Tech$700kInternational$632kHuman Services$426kCivil Rights$398kCommunity Improvement$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $157k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $530k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION$1,000,000
NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC$460,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$150,000
ASIAN ART MUSEUM$100,000
WHITNEY MUSEUM$80,000
COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN NORTH KOREA$50,000
NEW MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$50,000
AUSTRALIAN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP DIALOGUE FOUNDATION$50,000
FRIENDS OF NEW CURATORS INC$50,000
BLANTON MUSEUM AT UT AUSTIN$25,000
THE INSTITUTE OF FINE ARTS AT NYU$25,000
METROPOLITAN OPERA$25,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - CANTOR ARTS CENTER$20,000
TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION$16,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOLD HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $125k → 14%WONDERS & WORRIES: $10k → 10%PVBLIC FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%Gold House Foundation Inc: $50k → 14%Gold House Foundation Inc: $25k → 14%Motion Picture and Television Fund: $15k → 14%Australian American Leadership Dialogue Foundation: $50k → 17%Australian American Leadership Dialogue Foundation: $50k → 17%AUSTRALIAN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP DIALOGUE FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%AUSTRALIAN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP DIALOGUE FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Kahng Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kahng Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.3M · 38 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
43

Total granted

$9.3M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+17%

Still filing today

61%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $964k · revenue +18%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2017–2024 · $755k · revenue +202% · 72% of their budget
  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART
    8× · 2018–2025 · $391k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $350k
  • UA
    UT Austin - Strauss CenterLBJ School
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SG
    Stanford Graduate School of Business
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
2
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
3
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
4
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
The Performance Art Museum

The performance art museum (pam) is the first u.s. institution exclusively dedicated to the presentation and preservation of live art. our mission is to facilitate the powerful impact of live experiences that can profoundly transform our…

Arts & Culture
7
The Paley Center for Media

Description of organization mission: the paley center for media is the premier institution dedicated to advancing the understanding of media-it's artistic value, social impact and historical importance-for the public and media…

Arts & Culture
8
Smithsonian Institution

*increase and diffusion of knowledge* is the mission set forth by james smithson. the smithsonian endeavors to shape the future by preserving our heritage, discovering new knowledge, and sharing our resources with the world.

Arts & Culture
9
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
10
Berggruen Institute
Education
11
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
12
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ps 1 Contemporary Art Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Netkal Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
27/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $1,133,510 · OtherGUGGENHEIM FOUNDATIONST PATRICKS CATHEDRAL LANDMARK FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · OtherST PATRICKS CATHEDRAL LANDMARK FOUNDATION INCUniversity of Michigan: $755,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganBlanton Museum of Art The University of Texas at Austin: $605,000 · OtherBlanton Museum of Art The University of Texas at AustinIndividual grant recipient: $350,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUniversity of Texas at Austin Dell Medical Center: $250,000 · Other+49 more: $1,966,177 · Other+49 moreTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $963,736 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIET…ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $800,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF S…SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $629,705 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATIONWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $391,135 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $166,500 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA: $146,100 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $336,110 · Arts & Culture+12 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $700,000 · EducationPresident …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $422,136 · EducationTHE BOARD …+2 more: $21,000 · EducationU S COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN NORTH KOREA: $260,000 · InternationalTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $225,074 · InternationalAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL: $135,000 · InternationalFOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC: $130,000 · InternationalAmerican-Australian Education Leadership Foundation Inc: $75,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF NEW CURATORS INC: $50,000 · International+2 more: $15,455 · InternationalAUSTRALIAN-AMERICAN LEADERSHIP DIALOGUE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesGOLD HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesPVBLIC FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Human Services+2 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY: $65,000 · Public BenefitELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 · Health
Other$6,059,687Arts & Culture$3,433,286Education$1,143,136International$890,529Human Services$475,000Public Benefit$65,000Health$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $963,736 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $800,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $755,000 over 3y, 72% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $700,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $629,705 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $422,136 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $391,135 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetU S COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN NORTH KOREA: $260,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $225,074 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTRALIAN-AMERICAN LEADERSHIP DIALOGUE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 4y, 51% of budgetGOLD HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $166,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN LYRIC OPERA: $146,100 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL: $135,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetFOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC: $130,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWNET: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican-Australian Education Leadership Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 71% of budgetNATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $57,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $53,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $50,110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPVBLIC FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEW CURATORS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $22,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SEJONG SOLOISTS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $11,930 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWonders & Worries Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNETKAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetPS 1 CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL OF KOREAN AMERICANS INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS MUSEUM OF ART: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEJONG CULTURAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetPACIFIC COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL POLICY: $3,525 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds U S COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN NORTH KOREA ↗
  • Who funds THE ASIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUSTRALIAN-AMERICAN LEADERSHIP DIALOGUE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLD HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN LYRIC OPERA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FOREIGN POLICY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds American-Australian Education Leadership Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY ↗
  • Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY16.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kahng Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kahng Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kahng’s filings →

More from the funding graph