Skip to content
K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$476k
Granted FY2026still arriving
31
Grants FY2026still arriving
6
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Arts & Culture$940kPhilanthropy$518kEducation$228kHuman Services$194kHealth$153kYouth Development$66kAnimals$51kReligion$45kOther$0
02FY2026 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $103k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chapel and York US Foundation Inc$102,500
Exploration Place Inc$25,000
Phillips Fundamental Learning Center Inc$25,000
Empower Evergreen Inc$25,000
Childrens Mercy Hospital$25,000
Episcopal Social Services Inc$20,000
Assistance League of Wichita Inc$20,000
Wichita State University Foundation$20,000
Botanica Inc$20,000
University of VirginiaMcIntire School$20,000
Agape Care Cradle$15,495
Wichita Childrens Home$15,000
United Way of the Plains Inc$15,000
Plumb Place Inc dba Southwick House$15,000
Camp Wood YMCA Inc$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KSDS Assistance Dogs Inc: $10k → 10%Camp Wood YMCA Inc: $15k → 11%Camp Woods YMCA: $5k → 11%Empower Evergreen Inc: $25k → 16%Assistance League of Wichita Inc: $20k → 16%Assistance League of Wichita Inc: $2k → 16%The Treehouse Inc: $10k → 16%Rainbows United Inc: $10k → 16%Rainbows United Inc: $1k → 16%Pando Initiative: $10k → 16%Wichita Childrens Home: $15k → 16%Envision Foundation Inc: $5k → 16%Wichita Childrens Home: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
IA
IN
NJ
CT
MO
KY
KS
AR
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 22 repeat orgs$793k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
53

Total granted

$1.2M
$560k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

82%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $233k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MARK ARTS INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $737k · revenue +43%
  • EP
    EXPLORATION PLACE INC
    3× · 2023–2026 · $40k · revenue +130%
  • KH
    KANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS
    4× · 2023–2026 · $26k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC
    one grant, 2025 · $38k · revenue 0%
  • AA
    Alzheimer's Association Kansas
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • AC
    ALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $26k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wichita-Sedgwick County Historical Museum Association

To educate the community and its visitors about local history by collecting, preserving and interpreting materials reflecting the heritage of wichita and sedgwick county

Arts & Culture
2
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
3
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
4
Wichita Eye Foundation

To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.

Health
5
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
6
Kansas Hospital Association

The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.

—
7
Wichita Downtown Development Corporation

The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.

Community Improvement
8
Guadalupe Health Foundation

To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.

—
9
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
10
Wichita Public Library Foundation Inc

Wplf seeks private charitable support to create young readers, ensure digital inclusion, and provide equitable access to information. wplf's sole purpose is to create a margin of excellence at wichita public library.

Education
11
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
12
Opportunity Wichita Inc

Engage community partners (including local governments, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions) to develop a community vision to address education, quality of life, infrastructure, workforce, and economic development and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Northwest Arkansas; the most unlike its peers is Junior League of Northwest Arkansas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/57
Grantees still filing
37/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARK ARTS INC: $737,207 · Arts & CultureMARK ARTS INCEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $59,000 · Arts & Culture+6 moreCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $449,500 · PhilanthropyCHAPEL & YORK US FOUND…UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $8,000 · PhilanthropyAm Fnd National Museums Scotland: $69,010 · OtherAm Fnd National Museums Scotl…Alzheimer's Association Kansas: $35,000 · OtherAlzheimer's Association Kansa…Catholic Charities-Wichita: $30,000 · OtherKANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS: $26,000 · OtherTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $38,000 · OtherTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY…+46 more: $441,088 · Other+46 moreALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · EducationBUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $26,000 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $25,000 · EducationMUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE WICHITA LIBRARY INC: $15,000 · EducationFriends University: $10,000 · EducationCHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC: $10,000 · EducationWICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $2,340 · EducationEMPOWER EVERGREEN INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesCAMP WOOD YMCA INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $16,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesENVISION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $25,000 · HealthEPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH: $20,000 · HealthHOLY FAMILY MEDICAL INC: $20,000 · HealthAGAPE'CARE CRADLE INC: $15,495 · HealthCENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $11,500 · HealthSUSAN B ALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,500 · Health+1 more: $3,000 · HealthGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $37,500 · Youth DevelopmentGOOD SPORTS INC: $10,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$836,207Philanthropy$482,500Other$639,098Education$179,340Human Services$129,000Health$105,495Youth Development$47,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARK ARTS INC: $737,207 over 6y, 15% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $449,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetEXPLORATION PLACE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FILSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $38,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $37,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKANSAS HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA KANSAS: $26,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF WICHITA INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMUSIC YOUTH PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetCAMP WOOD YMCA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF SEDGWICK COUNTY: $18,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRanchland Trust of Kansas Inc: $16,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WICHITA LIBRARY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PANDO INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION NORTHWEST ARKANSAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSTEPSTONE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBALLET WICHITA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGOODHUE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $9,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetJunior League of Northwest Arkansas Inc: $8,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetPEACE AT HOME FAMILY SHELTER INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetENVISION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGuadalupe Clinic Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWichita Art Museum Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUSAN B ALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN-SCOTTISH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE TIME FOUNDATION: $2,340 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dwane L and Velma Lun…Wichita FoundationTextron Charitable Tr…Berry Foundation IncThe Fidelity Bank Fou…Kansas Health Foundat…Goebel Family-Star Lu…Lattner Family Founda…Ima FoundationUnited Way of the Pla…Bruce G Cochener Foun…The Walser Foundation
Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable FoundationKS68.1× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Berry Foundation Inc · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · The Walser Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on K T Wiedemann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home