Skip to content
Jyming Wang Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jyming Wang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$36kEducation$36kInternational$13kHuman Services$11kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$3kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$464k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHILDREN'S SOCIETY ORCHESTRA$5,000
CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
THE METROPOLITAN OPERA$2,750
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC ACADEMY$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES: $5k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
MD
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$111k · 22 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
8

Total granted

$111k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+25%

Still filing today

45%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $7k · revenue +91%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • RS
    Revived Soldiers Ukraine
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -65%
  • QB
    QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +25%
  • AE
    ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MED
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
6
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
7
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
8
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Living Hope for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $32,510 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE METROPOLITAN OPERA: $12,500 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN OPERATHE CHILDRENS ORCHESTRA SOCIET: $6,500 · OtherTHE CHILDRENS ORCHESTRA SOCIETCHILDREN'S SOCIETY ORCHESTRA: $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S SOCIETY ORCHESTRAIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,700 · Other+10 more: $10,150 · Other+10 moreCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE CHR…LIVING HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $1,340 · Human ServicesLIVING HOPE…+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,000 · HealthPARTNERS …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 · HealthBLOOD CAN…NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureDancing Classrooms Inc: $4,100 · Arts & CultureMercy Corps: $2,500 · InternationalRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 · InternationalCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $2,782 · Food & NutritionFRESH AIR FUND: $1,700 · Recreation & SportsQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$76,360Human Services$11,440Health$10,000Arts & Culture$8,600International$5,000Food & Nutrition$2,782Recreation & Sports$1,700Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDancing Classrooms Inc: $4,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $2,782 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $1,340 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds Dancing Classrooms Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds LIVING HOPE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jyming Wang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jyming Wang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jyming Wang’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home